Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL: Snyder says league "can't ---- with me" because he has dirt


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

I saw that, and I just want him to let it out.

Let's see how horrific the NFL really is at the highest levels.  Then yes, force the owners out, change up the structure of the league.  The GB model would be interesting indeed.

Then again, who would rake in the billions and get rich off the backs of the workers?

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Jerry must have been easy to get rid of.  He could have used some of that dirt to protect himself apparently.

Jerry wanted to sell. He wanted the money and wanted his family out of the business, for whatever reasons. He cried all the way to the bank.

 

  • Pie 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Growl said:

Idk if he has dirt that could ruin the nfl I’m kinda in his corner 

 

let’s hear it Dan 

“I was there. When it happened. I was there when Goodell told clete Blakeman “Manning is going out on top. See to it.”

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, d-dave said:

I saw that, and I just want him to let it out.

Let's see how horrific the NFL really is at the highest levels.  Then yes, force the owners out, change up the structure of the league.  The GB model would be interesting indeed.

Then again, who would rake in the billions and get rich off the backs of the workers?

It needs some tweaking and updating but it would be interesting to see. Involvement would be way up IMO but the owners with their control have also pushed some changes on the league that have led in the direction it stands now. I don't know if anyone has ever done a serious deep look into the +/-s of it all.

Second part? The players and most of the public money would no longer be needed to help those fugs ride the gravy train. Hell what if you could get a dividend check for investing in the Panthers? 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Waldo said:

Hell what if you could get a dividend check for investing in the Panthers? 

Dude, if I could invest stock in the Panthers....it might be a good gamble.  The NFL has done nothing but make money for decades, and the league is still interested in making cash, even if there weren't your traditional owners.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Wow, NFL owners must be a more trashy bunch than we could ever realize.

I'll bet you Jerry Richardson is a choir boy compared to these guys. I'm almost sure of it.

That’s what the NFL is. Not just owners, players as well. POS humans galore. But the NFL is not here to teach us child book lessons - it’s here for entertainment. I always chuckle at the moral high ground people caring about a single incident but continue to watch the sport lol. I mean we don’t want Peyton because of bountygate right???
 

Like if you don’t want to support a business because of it offending or violating literally any cause that has ever existed whatsoever in the history of modern mankind,  the NFL is it. Rape, murder, human rights, animal rights, child abuse, it’s endless.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Wow, NFL owners must be a more trashy bunch than we could ever realize.

I'll bet you Jerry Richardson is a choir boy compared to these guys. I'm almost sure of it.

I mean most billionaires are, a chick  I’m currently sleeping with used to work for Amazon HQ in WA or wherever it is, and she has some stories about golden boy Bezos

Edited by panthersgreenville
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Wow, NFL owners must be a more trashy bunch than we could ever realize.

I'll bet you Jerry Richardson is a choir boy compared to these guys. I'm almost sure of it.

^^This^^. As I point out in a previous post,if y'all are looking for "Mother Teresa's" as owners, it ain't happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, d-dave said:

Dude, if I could invest stock in the Panthers....it might be a good gamble.  The NFL has done nothing but make money for decades, and the league is still interested in making cash, even if there weren't your traditional owners.

It would never make the kind of money it does without the greed of the owners. They absolutely drive that magnitude but I still think a model based off of GB but way improved could work. From what little I know about them it is run more as a community and not for profit but if you had stockholder elected people running the team in place of an owner it should work a lot better. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
    • They might be ass but it’s the professional level like NFL!! I will take a win no matter what!! Still not over
    • So you are just going by what these analysts are saying. So if come draft time they say Ward/Sanders is worth pick 1 you should be good. The future draft QB class is always going to be projected as the next great thing until these young players start playing the game and scouts can see some flaws. Think of all of the high school phenoms that didn’t look as good in college.  If Manning does turn out to be the next great prospect only one team gets to draft him. Odds are someone else could get the top pick, especially if go all in on building a supporting roster. I’m never going to be a just wait another year guy, because there are so many variables. If our staff loves Ward/Sanders then we should just draft them with our pick. It’s as simple as that. I also might go with Hunter over TMac as WR1 in this class.  The roster has the OL to help a young QB, young weapons in Coker, XL, and JT to grow with a QB, and a RB who can catch in Brooks as a safety net for a young QB. Sign a vet WR, extend BC and our offense would be set outside of depth. Let our young offensive core go through their growing pains while we iron out the defense. It’s definitely a path forward.
×
×
  • Create New...