Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wilks ain't it


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, jackson113 said:

PJ decided to hand it off to CMC instead of taking the pass. He would have had Robbie in the flat. It's all on PJ. PJ doesn't know how to play with a good O line. Y'all making a big deal out of next gen stats. Need to see the rest of the field. PJ is garbage.

Screenshot_20221018-194158.thumb.jpg.6ea2a43e4d4a4c320accc7df5ecb6960.jpg

He’s looking at Robbie but Robbie is not looking back, so if he throws it… it’s probably a pick 6. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, weyco2000 said:

He’s looking at Robbie but Robbie is not looking back, so if he throws it… it’s probably a pick 6. 

He was going to throw picks anyway.  We were going to lose that game no matter what.

It seems to me the goal was to keep the score close and try to prevent PJ from turning the ball over as much as possible. They failed miserably. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

He was going to throw picks anyway.  We were going to lose that game no matter what.

It seems to me the goal was to keep the score close and try to prevent PJ from turning the ball over as much as possible. They failed miserably. 

Trust me, I’m no Walker fan. But he seems to do pretty good when the game plan is scripted. His picks occur when he’s forcing it, primarily in the red zone. But yeah I agree, the plan was probably don’t turn the ball over and get CMC the ball in space. Which could be expected after firing the Head Coach on Monday and having your starting QB in a walking boot.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/16/2022 at 7:11 PM, Wundrbread33 said:

PJ has shown he can complete a forward pass before. Inexcusable game plan today. Sure he’s going to throw an interception eventually…but what’s the solution? Not even trying?…oh and then you let Eason make some throws? Start him then. 

 

I don’t know who’s idea this plan was for sure, but they can go ahead and no longer be near anything football related ever again. It would be a net gain for football. 

Thank you for having one of the more logical posts on this topic. I can go along with  the game plan to run the ball a lot to try keeping the score close.

However, when the Panthers got down score wise, it was obvious to everyone that they needed to open the game up more by passing the ball.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

No adjustments, in scheme or  personnel. Too conservative. Just won't take the bull by the horns. You have to know who you are playing, as well as your own weaknesses. Wilks is going to be out-coached in this league a lot. 

Say what you want, Wilks is missing something. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...