Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just Sitting Here, Hitting Refresh


Recommended Posts

Anyone else just sitting here this morning hitting refresh, waiting to see where our players get traded. 

After yesterdays performance, pretty sure at least one player is traded away today.  

I am assuming a team is going to give us a contingent 4th-6th for Robbie Anderson that is dependent on performance. 

Packers obviously need WR help.  Giants as well. Miami could be dealing with some injuries to the WRs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RA this week and we will see who could be up after this game. Players sometimes need a change of scenery and years like we had under Rhule are easy examples of why.

I have no idea if Wilks can calm that lockerroom down at this point.

Edited by Waldo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D. said:

Anyone else just sitting here this morning hitting refresh, waiting to see where our players get traded. 

After yesterdays performance, pretty sure at least one player is traded away today.  

I am assuming a team is going to give us a contingent 4th-6th for Robbie Anderson that is dependent on performance. 

Packers obviously need WR help.  Giants as well. Miami could be dealing with some injuries to the WRs. 

Yep, I’m doing the same. BTW you still selling that delicious water?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, countryboi said:

Robbie really did a number on his trade value, teams are just going to wait for him to get cut. 

It's why the team should punish him and see if he will play again. That would be beneficial to all sides. If not deactivate him and trade/cut him in the off season when his cap hit is more reasonable. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A day removed from yesterdays pain; if I was coach, I’d have a man to man with Anderson, basically give him one and wash yesterday under the bridge, explain why acting like that helps no one (including his reputation) and try to move forward. Remind him that the cameras will always find you, and that it was a terrible look yesterday. It’s easy to get blacklisted in this league, so you have to manage your image. 
 

Losing is frustrating, and the offense as a whole has been frustrating. We all want to scream. 
 

Then if it happens again…well that’s that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...