Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Robbie Anderson traded to Arizona


jamos14
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

it's just a little suspect they're going after (1) his hair, which is locks and extremely black, and (2) his register of speech, which is unapologetically AAE and extremely black. it feels like they're using robbie sucking and being a jerk as a vehicle to bag on black culture 

it probably feels that way because you’re always on alert to be offended

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Dude.  And this will be my last post on this.

 

Between Robbies actions, interviews and twitter posts the dude is a fuging moron.  It has nothing to do with his dialect or register of speech.  Its crazy to try and tag the racism label to folks laughing at this dumb motherfuger.   He cannot string together 2 fuging sentences where he doesnt sound idiotic.  I get it, thats his shtick but being labeled a retard and being laughed at goes with that territory.   I mean is basic English that hard to learn?

According to some, my English teachers, including some black, are racist for being so strict with the language and having high standards. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

According to some, my English teachers, including some black, are racist for being so strict with the language and having high standards. 

wrong. no language or dialect that has an internally consistent registry is "wrong" because the only way one is "right" is if someone with power says it is (historically white ppl obviously.)

some language or dialect can be inappropriate for a particular situation. my teacher correcting me from saying "ain't" in school ain't wrong, because in school and in formal settings we say isn't because that's more appropriate. with my friends i say ain't and that's fine.

robbie is talking in AAE as a football player in a locker room where you're paid millions of dollars to sell an entertaining product to consumers. robbie speaking AAE as an entertainer isn't inappropriate. when robbie goes to the bank he probably code switches to something a little more "standard" or "appropriate" for the context as many people with nonstandard english dialects do.

language use is governed by history and power and we should remember which of its social advantages we carry with us without having earned it by wielding it like a sword to cut down those who use it differently.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Call Me James said:

Who signed RA to that terrible deal?

 

Who had final say over roster decisions?

Not saying Fitt didn’t make a mistake but some of you fail to realize the extent of Rhule’s control over the roster. His near total autonomy on roster decisions was part of his contract deal. You can thank Tepper and Marty Meatballs for that.

Edited by Prowler2k18
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

it's just a little suspect they're going after (1) his hair, which is locks and extremely black, and (2) his register of speech, which is unapologetically AAE and extremely black. it feels like they're using robbie sucking and being a jerk as a vehicle to bag on black culture 

I mean, if they're like, "his stupid African hair", etc. then they should be banned at once.

But it does look pretty silly. People should be allowed to make fun of a hairstyle. It's just hair. If we're going to put ancestry and heritage off-limits ... welp ... no making fun of any fat guy with Italian roots lol, guys with red hair (don't say the G Word), accents, first and last names, religious stuff, etc.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

I mean, if they're like, "his stupid African hair", etc. then they should be banned at once.

But it does look pretty silly. People should be allowed to make fun of a hairstyle. It's just hair. If we're going to put ancestry and heritage off-limits ... welp ... no making fun of any fat guy with Italian roots lol, guys with red hair (don't say the G Word), accents, first and last names, religious stuff, etc.

i mean yeah sure in a vacuum. but in the context of our culture there's no powerful, structural prejudice against redheads such that saying the G Word would be an obvious reflective slur. whereas the N word (or making fun of black folks hair, which is DEEPLY rooted to black culture) absolutely could be. so even if it's intended innocently why bother? why take the chance of making some look at you sideways and half to decide if you're being funny or racist? seems a lot easier just not to go there 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nothing wrong with starting to look for bodies early. It's a long injury filled season. I doubt we get through unscathed. 
    • We're in alignment regarding Thielen not being a game changer/breaker for the Panthers. Getting the ball into hands of playmakers like TMac and XL is going to open up things more than it is getting it to Thielen underneath (or letting him go after 50/50 balls 20yds downfield in his mid-30s). However, in a room where the other guys are two second year guys and two rookies, having a reliable vet that they can learn from is just as important as it is for the QB to have as a reliable third option. I can see that being worth $8.5M (just 3%) of the $279.2M cap... especially when looking at what's left out there: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/position/wr However, the idea that the team is forcing production to Thielen and leading to losses isn't supported by the data. Targets, not receiving yards, are how you can tell if a player is being "force fed." In the two games mentioned, let's look at the other players available... vs. TB 10 targets - Adam Thielen 9 targets - David Moore 8 targets - Tommy Tremble, Xavier Legette 3 targets - Jonathon Brooks 1 target - Dan Chisena, Feleipe Franks, Stephen Sullivan vs. PHI 11 targets - Adam Thielen 8 targets - Xavier Legette 5 targets - Chuba Hubbard, David Moore 2 targets - Tommy Tremble 1 target - Ja'Tavion Sanders, Deven Thompkins There isn't exactly a bounty of other names to throw the ball to. In those games, AT was one of the top 2 WRs. Diontae had been gone by that point.   So... yea. Agreed that Thielen isn't exactly carrying the team in his mid-30s, but it's undeniable that he was the most reliable target last season that still has quite a bit of value this season. Whether or not that value is reflected in a manner folks think on the contract is going to come down to personal taste. However, the idea that the team was forcing production to AT and that was the reason behind some losses couldn't be further from the truth.
    • I would also add that I think it's more than money.  AT has looked absolutely miserable out there at times, and there was a lot of speculation he would demand to be traded.  Personally, I thought he was a lock to be moved last year.  Maybe his hamstring is the only thing that prevents that from happening. The fact that he's not only willing to come back and play, but excited about it, really bodes well for Bryce.  AT is a veteran and he knows the game.  If he didn't have confidence in Bryce, I guarantee you he wouldn't be in a Panther uniform this year.  I'll take that as a positive.
×
×
  • Create New...