Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you think Tepper promised Wilks the permanent job if he loses out?


TylerDurden
 Share

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

Or he saw his Arizona tenure and thought that’s a man that can guarantee the No 1 pick 

I think that is what happened.  There were 3 coaches with HC experience, he chose the only one who tanked for the #1 pick.  When asked if Wilks could turn it around, Tepper laughed and then caught himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Wish it was the case but I think they’re that bad, that might have been the worst offensive game plan since the d will in wildcat formation the entire game vs the falcons years back….

It's worse. That team won the game.  This team was, well I don't know what it was. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, in my defense, I didn't know Wilks was part of the Flores lawsuit.

That being said...  I also don't care.  This thread was half in jest, because honestly, wtf do we have to talk about worth talking about anymore this season.  Our team fuging sucks and we have a fuging horrible owner.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don’t need Wilks. Just the way he talks and how he carry’s himself screams “I’m a conservative, defensive minded head coach who plays not to lose instead of playing to win.” 
 

I want a young and offensive mind for our next head coach considering we are absolutely drafting a QB no 1. Wilks ceiling is Jeff Fisher or at best John Fox and even that is being VERY generous.

Edited by panthersgreenville
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...