Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PJ Walker will start VS Bucs and “Moving forward” (week by week)

WarPanthers89

By WarPanthers89,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

DaveThePanther2008 Grand Master

DaveThePanther2008

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

They will probably throw on every down.  Which won't be many for the offense because there be some ints mixed in.

The defense show get a lot of play if Brady doesn't go through them like a gas station hotdog that is.

This game could get out of hand in a hurry.

Brady isn't the QB he was during their championship run a couple of years ago.   He was blaming his line but he is a statue back there and needs to retire.   He doesn't have Gronk and is lost.  Gronk was his safety blanket.

That said, TB will score late in the game because our defense will be on the field 45 of the 60 minutes and be gassed by the 4th quarter. 

It's pretty sad when your defense has scored more TDs than your offense the last 3 weeks. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted

All of our QBs are terrible so it really doesn't matter which flavor of crap we get this week. Sam is terrible but why rush it? They fugging know what he is and running him out like an injured Rogers to save the season and win a SB only to get slaughtered would make them look like idiots.  

It's just survive the season and nothing more from here on out. PJ is the sacrifice this week and next week we may have new blood to throw at the football gods so they can continue to poo on us Panther fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherBoy95 Experienced

PantherBoy95

Posted
Posted

I mean you can't win many football games not throwing beyond 7 yards. That's on the play caller not the player.  If you can't trust a guy THAT much, he shouldn't be out there. Sign a capable back up QB off the street Testaverde style or something.... But this last gameplan was ridiculously safe.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ladypanther Grand Master

ladypanther

Posted
Posted
Quote

To the common eye, it did not look like it mattered what defense the Rams showed pre-snap. Carolina was determined to execute its horizontal-raid offense.

lol

 

Quote

According to Underdog Football.com, Walker recorded a -0.1 average depth of target against the Rams. He is the first quarterback to post a negative A-DOT (average depth of target) in the database’s history.

image.jpeg.22f7b4e6630062647f59058b5178608d.jpeg

 

Read more at: https://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article267561612.html#storylink=cpy

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PghPanther Mentor

PghPanther

Posted
Posted

Just though

12 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Brady isn't the QB he was during their championship run a couple of years ago.   He was blaming his line but he is a statue back there and needs to retire.   He doesn't have Gronk and is lost.  Gronk was his safety blanket.

That said, TB will score late in the game because our defense will be on the field 45 of the 60 minutes and be gassed by the 4th quarter. 

It's pretty sad when your defense has scored more TDs than your offense the last 3 weeks. 

I just thought of something..........after last week's mess in Pgh..... just how pissed off would Brady be if they actually happened to lose to the Panthers this Sunday............LOLOLOOLOL!!!!

Good Gawd I'd love to see that post game press conference with Mr. Ego......it would almost be worth jeopardizing a #1 pick.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      You know what's worse about the QB situation?

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I liked Sanders field reading abilities in general but his ceiling is fairly low and his shenanigans as a pro are, quite frankly, bizarre.  I don't think he is doing himself any favors by being a distraction while also being buried on the depth chart. Don't get me wrong, the media would attempt to make him a distraction regardless but it's not smart to feed into it when you aren't having a role at all. This can also be said of XL, BTW. We are no stranger to this. It's a lot easier to excuse Cam dressing like a deleted scene Harry Potter character at press conferences when he is looking like a man among boys on the football field. 
    • TD alt
      You know what's worse about the QB situation?

      By TD alt · Posted

      I hear Huddlers throwing things similar about Sanders whenever his name comes up, but to put it bluntly, we don't know that to be true. What we do know is that plenty of Browns fans thought that Sanders had the best camp out of the bunch, notwithstanding not being given the opportunity to play with the ones. What has been reported is that Dillon Gabriel is Stefanski's guy, and Andrew Berry thought that Sanders should be prioritized (even if it meant that he would eventually trade Sanders due to Sanders having more value). The fact that many Browns fans preferred (and prefer now) Sanders, and that there was a split---or difference of opinion between Stefanski and Berry, isn't really up for debate. It's true.  What this all means, at the end of the day, is that we don't know how Sanders compares to Hooker or anyone else because he really hasn't had an opportunity to play for whatever reasons. 
    • kungfoodude
      You know what's worse about the QB situation?

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I don't think with a roster this bad we should be spamming picks at subpar QB's for development purposes. When the roster is a little more fleshed out, I would fully support that. Also, with our persistent evaluation problems, I can only imagine who we would have likely overdrafted in the past few years.
×
×
  • Create New...