Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The turf debate


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Charlotte isn't really the north.  According to that article I found KC, Baltimore, Washington, and Tennessee all have Bermuda grass fields.  Surprising to me.

I'm talking Greenbay  Chicago Pittsburgh Boston Seattle etc.

Charlotte should have Bermuda plain and simple.

UNC had that season they rolled out a new field every week and had no issues. Why can't Tepper use that?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

I wouldn’t use Bermuda as a homeowner in the north. Golf course, sports fields, etc places with the resources the maintain it and work on it is ok. A place like a professional football field with millions of dollars to keep an eye on it and engineer a system to help with it is a good example. 
 

but if you some dad living in Cleveland or Minnesota, you probably an idiot to use Bermuda or southern grass for your house. 

I live in the northeast now and KBG and Perennial Rye seem to be the best picks here.  Tall fescue can work but I haven't many fescue yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I live in the northeast now and KBG and Perennial Rye seem to be the best picks here.  Tall fescue can work but I haven't many fescue yards.

KBG is good and what I would do in NE. I did Rye here once to fill an unsightly bare spot and it was great for about a month. Some of my buddies cut their tall fescue with rye when overseedimg 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Tbe said:

I don’t get it. If the difference between real grass and fake is how much ‘give’ each has, why can’t fake be engineered with more padding and flex?

Seems like an easy thing to do.

There's only so much flex you can engineer into a product and have it withstand safety standards and durability for transport and installation. It also has to be stapled/staked into place to keep it locked down and prevent the product sliding. Weight alone won't do it. Grass roots tear in small areas or stretch like a mesh,  but the product as a whole still retains it's rigidity, unless it's a sopping wet monsoon. Then the roots actually lose their hold in the soil. With proper drainage and vacuum systems underneath, water can be sucked out from underneath the field to keep it relatively dry. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WUnderhill said:

I think it’s more about the concerts and other events at BOA, which is ridiculous because BOA is first and foremost a football stadium.

Unfortunately, we have an owner who’d rather put a feather in his cap and sit at a podium and brag about how he single handedly “brought music to Charlotte” because we were all such uncultured savages before who had never been to a concert.

Spectrum Center says hello Dave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They both have their pros and cons. Grass can be just as dangerous if quality people are not in charge. There's new technology out there and it's not like playing in SEA in decades past where the "turf" was just carpet hiding cement. There are a whole bunch of contact injuries caused by grass too where the foot gets caught in the dirt and hyper extends the knee and ankle. I think the NFL should really invest in companies trying to improve turf and good things will happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The challenge is the amount of natural soil/dirt that is under the grass to act as a cushion..............in nature there is an average of 30 inches of soil below the surface with 8 to 10 inches being top soil.

On a grass football field inside stadiums these days there is 16 inches total with 6 inches being top soil.

It offers far more cushion than any artificial surface but fall well short of the cushion that grass grows naturally on. 

Edited by PghPanther
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The reset worked with proton.me.. wouldn’t work with my Gmail, Yahoo or Verizon email accounts 
    • Wish they started at 5:30 or 6 at the latest so I can watch it. I have to be in bed by start time.
    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...