Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PJ Haters. Put some respect on his name.


TylerDurden
 Share

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

No, he might not be an all pro.  He might not be a pro bowler.  He might not be elite.  But he is a fuging gamer and a damn good football player.  

He struggled early, but when it mattered he fuging stepped up and killed it.  Ultimately, we arent in that game at all without PJ.  I know some are going to hate him no matter what, but right now, he's the best we have, and again, I see him in the same mold as a guy like Case Keenum or Heinicke, maybe even a Jake Delhomme in regards to his underdog origins, but only with a hell of a lot more natural talent with his arm and legs.  He might not be the guy you want, but again, he is a hell of a football player.  And when he is on, it is fuging fun to watch.  

Thank you for stepping up, PJ.  You have at least made us competitive and make a season that felt completely lost and hopeless fun to watch again.  Keep Pounding, baby!

You’re stealing my “Respek PJ” threads from last year?

birdman GIF

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pimpdaddy said:

again...this is NOT the bar you set for a QB....unless hes the second coming of Delhomme....

We have like what, 9 more weeks to see if he is! I do believe he is the best QB on the roster right now. More reps, more film will either prove that right or show me I'm full of poo.

This season is lost now, no reason to not try to find something to root for. A QB I have liked since the XFL isn't the worst thing to root for.

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no problem continuously signing him to cheap 1-year deals as the #3 QB.  For what he is...a #3 QB, PJ is actually solid dude.  Please don't get it twisted, he's a good QB when we are QB depleted, but he's no #1. 

Put like this, I'd put PJ up against any other #3 QB in the League and feel good about it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jopie87 said:

We have like what, 9 more weeks to see if he is! I do believe he is the best QB on the roster right now. More reps, more film will either prove that right or show me I'm full of poo.

This season is lost now, no reason to not try to find something to root for. A QB I have liked since the XFL isn't the worst thing to root for.

 

...i mean...wanted mayfield... so... i dont know sht...

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I have no problem continuously signing him to cheap 1-year deals as the #3 QB.  For what he is...a #3 QB, PJ is actually solid dude.  Please don't get it twisted, he's a good QB when we are QB depleted, but he's no #1. 

Put like this, I'd put PJ up against any other #3 QB in the League and feel good about it.

PJ, Corral, and rookie?  We definitely need a vet QB to help with our rookie.  Can PJ be that guy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why do you say that. What leads you to think that we, as supporters, think his ceiling is 10-12. That's a ridiculous assumption on your part. The Seahawks won the SB with Darnold passing for 25 TD's, 14 Ints with a 99.1 rating for the season.  The Panthers with Young were at 23 TD's, 11 Ints and a 78.8 rating for the season. Not that far off. The problem with all the Young discourse around here is the assumption that the QB is the sole determining factor for a teams success. That just isn't true and it's certainly not how Morgan and Tilis are building the Panthers. 
    • Do we pay based on how many wins or how many games Bryce led us to wins? We've spent quite a bit on defense this year and hopefully they're much improved. If the Panthers do get to 10 wins, but Bryce has another year like last year where he showed up big in a couple, was present in a few, and forgettable in most, do we still pay him 50m per year?  I keep bringing it up because I think it's relevant, but Bryce was outplayed by a 6m per year backup last year. I don't see how it's possible to pay a top tier QB contract to someone who's putting up backup QB production. 
    • I understand tempering expectations, but there are some issues with his points. Walker was a 3 year starter, but Green Bay let him walk and no other team was quick to snatch him up. That says something. Freeling will compete to start. With Hunter, we rotate our linemen and even 5th round pick Cam Jackson played some meaningful snaps last year. Both Brown III and Wharton have underwhelmed since we picked them up. Hunter is a run plugger that we have needed. Hunter will play early, even if he isn't the "starter." Brazzell was described as one of Canales' favorite prospects in the draft and he has a speed element we have been missing. I think Canales is going to have plays drawn up with Brazzell on the field just out of pure excitement. It will be up to Brazzell to prove he can handle it, though. If he can, he will play. As far as our secondary picks, yeah they have to earn their stripes and Evero tends to lean on veterans. So they might take time, but if they can show they can play, they will see the field. Smith-Wade and Ransom did. Sam Hecht simply has to show he can handle the mental side of the NFL game. If he can, he is in a direct competition with Fortner, who's also relatively young, but also on his 3rd NFL team and doesn't have the power profile of Hecht.  I can appreciate that Gantt wants to pour cold water on what was perceived as an impactful draft, but facts are facts.
×
×
  • Create New...