Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Top 5 QBs taken over the last 12 years


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

Folks, 

You don’t have to pick a specific guy others want you to pick when you draft first overall. When you have that pick, you can take whoever you deemed to be “your guy”. Also don’t forget there’s a reason a team drafts first overall. They are a bad team. They have a harder time climbing their team out of the gutter compared to a guy drafted 15th overall. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing that this chart tells me is that the current superstar QBs in todays game were picked in the 1st round, some of them may not have been top 5 picks but still in the first round. The right player with the right coaching/organization fit is huge, look at Josh Allen and Lamar. These guys were so raw, some even saw Lamar as a RB, coaching now a days needs to adapt to the player not the other way around. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

So what's the point of this thread? Stick with PJ?

I mean ... you know how we got Cam, right? We drafted him.

Point of this thread is you don’t have to tank the season away to get a good QB because it’s usually a crapshoot anyways.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see archetypes for the QB draft.  

there's the athlete, the game manager, the media favorite, then guys with talent who for whatever reason cant get out of their own way.   Injuries do fall into this category. 

I propose the "breakfast club"  QB class system.  

1 .the Princess

2. the Criminal

3. the Basket case

4. the Brain

5. the Jock

example recent class. Pickett is a princess. Willis is the Jock Bailey is the Brain.  it's between corrall and rudder to prove me wrong neither will end up the basket case or criminal. My money is on Ridder as the Criminal. 

just look at the OP's handy chart and you can't tell me Lawrence was not the princess of his class.  Have fun.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gipetto said:

Why is everyone giving up on matt corral already

Well maybe because he was Rhule and generally unless they have real good reason the next staff isn’t invested in him. Corral didn’t show anything on film that I would consider real valuable for them to witness. So far. 
I see him as unknown still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, rayzor said:

Play as good as we can now.

Win as much as we can now.

And get the best QB we can in the draft. 

There wasn't a sure shot QB last season. The Panthers, needing a QB, drafted an OT with the number six pick. Not Pickett, not Willis, not Corral.

There's not a sure shot QB this year either, neither Young, Stroud or Levis is a top tier pick at QB.

I totally agree. Get as many wins as you can BUT it's probably unlikely they pick any of these guys at QB with a top 5-10 pick.

The risk would be huge taking any of these QBs this year top ten. Although I'm on the Levis as the top pick of this group bandwagon, I still don't think Levis is a bonafide top 10 pick, more like a late first, second round guy.

Not to high on this class at all. If there was a Cam in this draft I'd be all in but there is not.

I see us going BPA or something close to it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

you need to draft AR in the first because of the 5th year option

This is the move. If you need him to sit a year, which he does as of now, you want those 4 extra rookie years of his contract. This is probably why some team drafting in the back of the first takes a swing on him. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...