Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Carolina Panthers are Idiots


davos
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yea we are talking a first rounder in fuging 2025 people. With a competent coaching staff we should be competitive by then.

In any case it’s also mind numbingly shocking how stubborn Tepper is. Like you see what’s going on and still think you need to be involved in things without ANY help. That is batshit crazy.

Edited by onmyown
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

What does it matter that the picks are 2/3 years away?  We are not in a win now mode and next year looks like more of the same, why not have a clear plan mapped out for multiple seasons?

I have no idea why people give a sh!t about the picks not being in next years draft.

With our dead money and QB situation there is no path to victory next season. Next season at best will be what 2011 was with Cam and Rivera. 

Having 2 1st rounders in years 2 and 3 of our QB’s rookie deal is a lot more ideal. 

The ONLY person this didn’t benefit was unfortunately the person who got to make the final decision… Fitterer

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Honestly half the nfl is mad because they didn’t acquire the players they wanted from the panthers.

The number or DJ and Burns jersey swaps people made showed that these players are wanted/good players.

And the media too. I can't remember how many times I heard talking heads say they need to go get DJ Moore from Carolina. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People really want draft picks 2 drafts from now for our best player on D? 24/25 draft picks

In hand is worth more then a maybe. Why trade a good young player just to hope to find a good young player?

DE is a premium position, everyone wants 1 or 2. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Burns' situation is the one to more closely monitor and we haven't necessarily shut the door on any front yet.  If a long term deal isn't made, he could very well be dealt in the offseason.  Who knows, maybe he gets lucky on a sack streak and his value goes up in a more competitive market after this season.  Just don't "Peppers" the situation.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sgt Schultz said:

I don't see any way, given the eight ball they are behind, that the Rams picks are mid to upper 20s of each round.  The most likely scenario is they are going to be drafting no better than the middle of the respective rounds, and in 2024 and 2025 quite possibly in the top 10-12.

They essentially sold the farm to win last year.  Hats off to them, they did it.  But they did so knowing full well what the price would be when the slide started....and the slide has started.

The irony of their offer is as good as Burns can be, I don't think he is their magic elixir to extend their run.  Unless they think he is going to help them hold teams under 10 points every week, their primary problem is the other side of the ball.

How many times did we say there was no way the Saints could fix their cap and be good again next year?

It's just a matter of how smart you are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You just have to chuckle at people who think that with Burns and Moore we'll compete next year. Because at this point, now that the trade deadline is over, that's all we have. At lot has to happen here in order for those two to make a difference next season.

Huddle: Stop signing FAs! It's such a gamble! You build through the Draft!

Also the Huddle: Three extra first round picks AND an extra second in Drafts to come? HELL NO! All we need to do is sign some FAs and we're golden in 2023 ... once we draft a late round QB and hire a good coach (which still might be Wilks! keep pounding!).

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Huddle: Stop signing FAs! It's such a gamble! You build through the Draft!

Also the Huddle: Three extra first round picks AND an extra second in Drafts to come? HELL NO! All we need to do is sign some FAs and we're golden in 2023 ... once we draft a late round QB and hire a good coach (which still might be Wilks! keep pounding!).

If you are going to use all of the radical comments on the huddle to support some type of argument why not use :

"Rhule is going to figure it out"
"PJ is our QB of the future"

"Derrick Brown is a bust"

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NFL defensive players who should be off limits ...

TJ Watt:

2019 14.5 sacks

2020 15 sacks

2021 22.5 sacks

 

Za'Darius Smith:

2019 13.5 sacks

2020 12.5 sacks

 

Joey Bosa:

2019 11.5 sacks

2020 7.5 sacks (12 games)

2021 10.5 sacks

 

Danielle Hunter:

2018 14.5 sacks

2019 14.5 sacks

2021 6 sacks (7 games)

 

Aaron Donald:

2018 20.5 sacks

2020 13.5 sacks

2021 12.5 sacks

 

Myles Garrett:

2018 13.5 sacks

2019 10 sacks

2020 12 sacks

2021 16 sacks

 

Nick Bosa:

2020 15.5 sacks

2021 8.5 sacks (7 games)

 

Trey Hendrickson:

2020 13.5 sacks

2021 14 sacks

 

Haason Reddick:

2020 12.5 sacks

2021 11 sacks

 

Micah Parsons:

2021 13 sacks

 

Matt Judon:

2021 12.5 sacks

2022 11.5 sacks (so far)

 

NFL defensive players who should NOT be off limits ... especially for THREE draft picks ...

Brian Burns:

2019 7.5 sacks

2020 9 sacks

2021 9 sacks

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

NFL defensive players who should be off limits ...

TJ Watt:

2019 14.5 sacks

2020 15 sacks

2021 22.5 sacks

 

Za'Darius Smith:

2019 13.5 sacks

2020 12.5 sacks

 

Joey Bosa:

2019 11.5 sacks

2020 7.5 sacks (12 games)

2021 10.5 sacks

 

Danielle Hunter:

2018 14.5 sacks

2019 14.5 sacks

2021 6 sacks (7 games)

 

Aaron Donald:

2018 20.5 sacks

2020 13.5 sacks

2021 12.5 sacks

 

Myles Garrett:

2018 13.5 sacks

2019 10 sacks

2020 12 sacks

2021 16 sacks

 

Nick Bosa:

2020 15.5 sacks

2021 8.5 sacks (7 games)

 

Trey Hendrickson:

2020 13.5 sacks

2021 14 sacks

 

Haason Reddick:

2020 12.5 sacks

2021 11 sacks

 

Micah Parsons:

2021 13 sacks

 

Matt Judon:

2021 12.5 sacks

2022 11.5 sacks (so far)

 

NFL defensive players who should NOT be off limits ... especially for THREE draft picks ...

Brian Burns:

2019 7.5 sacks

2020 9 sacks

2021 9 sacks

I said soooo many times I wanted Micah Parsons. I felt he would be the next Luke for us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Anytime you can trade a LB for 2 1sts and a 2nd you do that without hesitation. 

We need DE's, true DE's. Not 3-4 outside linebackers. 

Been saying this since last year. He’s going to mess his career up by not getting with a team that’s running a 3-4. He’s not cut out for the Peppers/Rucker role we want him to be. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

I dont understand the concept of "Trade 2 first round talents who are established in the league for 3 first round picks." 

Trading DJ would kill our cap situation and give us 20million in total dead cap. Trading Burns creates a huge hole on the roster. 

Trading Burns gets the team 3 high draft assets that could have been used to trade up for a QB prospect or draft rookie talent on cheap deals. Would have also freed up the money to pay him. Burns isn’t worth what the Rams offered it’s really that simple. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...