Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brugler: Next year's quarterbacks "not universally loved"


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Same poo new year. Just going to wait until another 10 years for the next Luck or Herbert/Allen or even Mahomes or Rodgers (who weren’t really drooled over either) comes out? 

I’ve learned media hype is bullshit and I find it hard to believe no one will workout to be a good QB in this entire draft.

What I have learned is unfortunately what really matters is your FOs ability to make sound decisions, and then set up  said sound decisions for success, so we are fuged no matter what anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s way more than the QB itself. But yes the QB needs to have the physical traits to play in the NFL, the mental makeup to survive being the face of a team, and the ability to be a leader. Not only as a football player but as a man as well.

After that you have to have a coaching staff that understands the strengths and weaknesses of that QB and can build an offensive scheme that highlights his strengths, and put players around him that compliment those strengths. It’s of course way easier said than done. The Panthers have failed in every aspect of finding a competent QB. Bridgewater didn’t have the physical tools and was weak mentally (his Twitter burner accounts proved that), Darnold had the physical tools but isn’t a leader and made too many mistakes, Mayfield doesn’t have the physical tools and the coaching was terrible for him. They have to draft a prospect with enough of everything to win games. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to happen all the time. When quarterbacks become draft eligible they get scrutinized more, and we get really picky and look for flaws. When they’re still a year away, it’s easier to focus solely on the positives/ceiling.

 

But I’m unwavering, it’s a massive failure of an off-season if you don’t draft a quarterback in round 1. Preferably Stroud or Young. Sell a future first if needed. We can not keep punting this issue. I’d still be thrilled with Bryce or CJ.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Cavscout said:

Cam Newton wasn't universally loved coming out of Auburn either. 

No he wasn't loved by everyone. That happens with every class. It was not unique to Cam. But he was the best in his class coming out. That is where it starts.

Determine where the candidate ranks among "his" class and then determine whether you want to get him or take a shot on a lesser rated classmate. It's the same with every draft class. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

This is said every year now it seems like.

It is. It's media driven hype that gets out before the scouting reports start to leak out. That's why I just laugh the hype driven stuff off most of the time. You have to let it play out and wait for the real scouting reports to leak out and not the media blowhards take.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

How did we go from “This is a deep, amazing class” to “This class may have 1 or 2 starter level QBs”?

 

Some of the expected guys didn't step up. In fact some cratered(Van Dyke) and some didn't make the expected jump(Richardson, Jefferson, etc). Some of the second tier prospects didn't improve either.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, *FreeFua* said:

Good

Because I think we’re going to win 1-3 more games and we’ll need someone to drop in the draft

Denver, Detroit, Pittsburgh and even Atlanta are games that could sewer us

I'm not seeing a win in there anywhere. But stranger things have happened to us. Out of those 4 our best chance at a win should logically be Detroit as they are Detroit.  But this year it's hard to predict.  Right now I do not see another win unless its gift-wrapped for them.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah the only way current set up is fun is if every year a different tiny school builds a super team and makes a run. You just need 1 rich guy to say you know what would be funny, if I drop 30 million and my school has a shot at a national championship.   They won't ever do it but put some sort of tiered salary cap in place and sign them to 4 year deals. You can only transfer up or down tiers no lateral moves because mean ole coach at texas doesn't play me enough so I'm going to Tennessee. So a player at prairie view can transfer to texas and get paid more or a player from UNC can transfer to UNCG because he isn't getting playing time. If a guy is transferring "up" he can get a salary bump if the team has salary cap space. A guy transferring down has to stay at the same salary as he signed his 4 year deal for so the lower tier team would have to have the cap space to sign him. It would stop the money chasing for lateral moves but allow guys who improve massively at lower schools to make more money as juniors and seniors and hopefully keep more guys in one place because the contract is for 4 years.
    • Bryce youngs first starts for 3 years   51 of 103 49%     153 yards avg 6 ints 2 tds   But this is the year he turns it around
    • His third year was worse than Bryce's third year, significantly so.  And he had a game where he threw for 120 yards, two inteceptions, and had a fumble.  He had multiple games where he threw for more int's than td's.  
×
×
  • Create New...