Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Darnold plays well,do they keep him around?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just cut the whole damn group loose (keep M.C around), or keep Darnold as a #2?

If they do pick a QB in the draft, keep Sam around to start until the rookie is ready to take the job?

What's your thoughts?

Edited by Jmac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't look like we are getting Stroud or Bryce. I am 1000% on board with rolling with PJ and Corral next year, see how Corral does and then make your decision on the QB position next year.

Reason being;

- Not a fan of any of the QBs this year

- Solidify another position through the draft or trade back this year

- Potential to draft Drake Maye or Harrison Jr. (depending on Corral situation) next year

I think it will ultimately come down to the HC, if its Wilks idk if he can afford another bad season but maybe he rolls with an offensive scheme similar to what we are doing now. And if we hire a new coach, he almost certainty will push to draft a QB this upcoming year. 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

That will be up to the next coach. As for me I'm indifferent to the whole thing. 

The whole QB position will be up in the air because a new head coach will want to put his stamp of approval on the team.

The QB position will be one of the main things he will address, to see who fits his his overall program plan..

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KatsAzz said:

The whole QB position will be up in the air because a new head coach will want to put his stamp of approval on the team.

The QB position will be one of the main things he will address, to see who fits his his overall program plan..

Pretty much. That's why all this qb melodrama is a waste of energy.  Until that is settled I just don't see the point in worrying about it. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends. 
 

If Darnold plays good and isn’t replaced before the end of the year, Wilks probably keeps him on a cheap deal, PJ on a cheap deal, and Corral. Maybe add another guy in the draft or FA.

 

If it’s another head coach, doubt any of them stay except Corral because he’s on his rookie deal 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

Depends. 
 

If Darnold plays good and isn’t replaced before the end of the year, Wilks probably keeps him on a cheap deal, PJ on a cheap deal, and Corral. Maybe add another guy in the draft or FA.

 

If it’s another head coach, doubt any of them stay except Corral because he’s on his rookie deal 

That would pretty much be my take as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The FA list is pretty comical. Teddy/Baker/Sam/PJ/Heinicke/Kyle Allen. Been there done that. Then you have Jimmy G, Brissett, Minshew. Then you have Keenum/Dalton and a couple other aging backups that may or may not even be interested in football. I don't really want any of them for more than $5M max

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's handing off play calling duties to fuging Brad Idzik as well so, either that mouth breather can run the playbook and Canales can grow as an all around head coach or it will be a horrible decision and both of them and BY can screw off. I'm fine with that as long as it isn't just another excuse for BY to get another year with another coach worthy of working around his limitations as a qb. 
    • Not only for Andersen but the whole team, having not beat the Habs this season before tonite.  Shows them that they aren't jinxed.
    • I understand why people say things like it could be worse in relation to Tepper but it just doesn't jive for me. Are the optics bad? Yes. Would I want her to be the owner of my team? No. But I mean she's only been owner for a year and the Colts overall are a better run organization. As far as I know they've also never had the distinction of having the worst win percentage in all of professional sports either. Tepper has owned this team for 8 years and about the only thing that has been consistent has been the ability to continue to find different ways to achieve new lows. Even now people are saying things are different yada yada but we said these same things at certain points under Rhule Fitterer and Reich. I'm going to wait to see how the rubber meets the road this upcoming season before I make any strong conclusions about anything in relation to the longevity under this franchise going forward.
×
×
  • Create New...