Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How to do a 180 degree turn around


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

Putting in Bozeman and choosing to run the ball down opponents throat seems like it would have been obvious even to an idiot like Rhule.

Wilks has done a great job since taking over and he’s playing to our teams strengths. We are running the ball well and playing defense. Not only that, but I appreciated the way he stuck with PJ and the way he later inserted Darnold to the top of the depth chart. He let PJ compete for the job and when he was no longer getting the job done, he went on to the next man up. Foreman has been amazing since taking over and this offensive line is going to be really special.

I wasn’t on the Wilks train for next season and I’m still not quite there just yet. But he’s starting to win me over. 

  • Pie 10
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Darnold is still bad (as the game went on he always looks worse and worse) but all others parts of the team held up and showed out. No question Wilks is doing an incredible job with not only the coaches that he has had to make his own (even after many have left) but also the players he inherited/ones that were traded away. He is winning despite having one of the worst QB rooms in the league. Props to him, he has me actually interested in watching Panthers football again. I did not care under Rhule, as it was some of the most boring, uninspired football that I have seen in our history. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Darnold is still bad (as the game went on he always looks worse and worse) but all others parts of the team held up and showed out. No question Wilks is doing an incredible job with not only the coaches that he has had to make his own (even after many have left) but also the players he inherited/ones that were traded away. He is winning despite having one of the worst QB rooms in the league. Props to him, he has me actually interested in watching Panthers football again. I did not care under Rhule, as it was some of the most boring, uninspired football that I have seen in our history. 

Yeah, being able to win games with one of the worst groups of QB's in the last decade+ should be something that Tepper needs to make note of.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

It's sheer insanity how long Bozeman was kept on the shelf because he was not one of the coaches favorites. How anyone can hate Wilks is bizarre. He may or may not end up being the permanent head coach but at the NFL level he's damn sure light-years better than big brain Rhule was.

Rhule will go down as a worse NFL coach than Urban Meyer when the dust finally settles.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Props to him, he has me actually interested in watching Panthers football again. I did not care under Rhule, as it was some of the most boring, uninspired football that I have seen in our history. 

100% how I feel. I’m not getting all invested with the team, but it is fun to watch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Darnold is still bad (as the game went on he always looks worse and worse) but all others parts of the team held up and showed out. No question Wilks is doing an incredible job with not only the coaches that he has had to make his own (even after many have left) but also the players he inherited/ones that were traded away. He is winning despite having one of the worst QB rooms in the league. Props to him, he has me actually interested in watching Panthers football again. I did not care under Rhule, as it was some of the most boring, uninspired football that I have seen in our history. 

Darnold was not good, but he has made great decisions when nothing is there (or when he doesn’t see anything there).

Taking sacks/throwing the ball away/using legs to buy time and not forcing the ball…I’ll take that from Sam. 
 

He looks calm and more mature out there, even if the stats aren’t there, because the bad stats (turnovers) aren’t there either. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wundrbread33 said:

Darnold was not good, but he has made great decisions when nothing is there (or when he doesn’t see anything there).

Taking sacks/throwing the ball away/using legs to buy time and not forcing the ball…I’ll take that from Sam. 
 

He looks calm and more mature out there, even if the stats aren’t there, because the bad stats (turnovers) aren’t there either. 

One major problem - "problem" - Sam routinely trusted receivers to make plays when he could have with his legs.  I actually think a few of those plays were on the receiver for not making, but at the goal line he really shoulda taken off and he had a couple first downs he could have had if he didn't throw on the run.

But the long pass down the sideline to Sullivan should have been a reception, but alas, our TEs...

Anyway, Wilks is clearly a legit NFL coach. Whether or not he is the best option long term, I'm much less sold on.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

Putting in Bozeman and choosing to run the ball down opponents throat seems like it would have been obvious even to an idiot like Rhule.

Wilks has done a great job since taking over and he’s playing to our teams strengths. We are running the ball well and playing defense. Not only that, but I appreciated the way he stuck with PJ and the way he later inserted Darnold to the top of the depth chart. He let PJ compete for the job and when he was no longer getting the job done, he went on to the next man up. Foreman has been amazing since taking over and this offensive line is going to be really special.

I wasn’t on the Wilks train for next season and I’m still not quite there just yet. But he’s starting to win me over. 

One of the biggest changes I've seen, regardless of QB, is Bozeman calling out protections, and effectively.  He is leaps and bounds better than most centers in the league and Rhule's choice of Elflein is probably the worst eval he had in the NFL.  DTs aren't collapsing the pocket which has been such a major problem since Kalil retired.

Because of this, Corbett and Brady are able to adjust quickly and those three have been doing a very good job together communicating and pushing the pile forward.  

We need to find a QB pronto because this OL is a really good one.  The defense is great.  

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't help but think that you are equating physical attributes alone with wins. I don't subscribe to that thought. No one will argue that Young has a strong arm, but he makes up for it in other ways. The real limitation for him is he needs good route runners with great hands. That's why Young was so good at the end of the 24 season. Thielen and Coker were perfect receivers for him and he had his best games with them. Not having them to start the 25 season hurt. Look at the first 10 games in 25 with a rookie receiver and no Coker and then look at the final 7 games with a more experienced rookie and Coker back and there is a telling difference in Young's performance. Prior to week 10, Young had 1 game with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and 6 games with a rating below 90. In the last 7 games with Coker back, Young had 3 games with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and only 2 games with a rating below 90. The tools a QB has to work with matter more than their arm strength.  To go back to Darnold and Stafford, yes they both have great arm strength but neither had much success with that alone. As I already pointed out, Stafford, even with a canon for an arm, only had 4 winning seasons in his first 12 years. It was only when he went to the right environment that he had true success.
    • I don't love this role for him if I'm being totally honest The pregame show is much more flash than substance and doesn't seem like the right fit for what Luke would bring to the table, and that's his vision of the game. I'd like to see him do something where it more involves him breaking down film and explaining what he's seeing out there, as he sees the game in a way very few ever have.
×
×
  • Create New...