Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Erving


RumHam
 Share

Recommended Posts

It was funny when they showed him(Irving) getting hyped up on the sideline with the other players and then he gets into the game and immediately commit a penalty.  The penalty stumped the momentum well atleast temporarily it did.  It is a reminder that Irving is still around.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Eclipse said:

It was funny when they showed him(Irving) getting hyped up on the sideline with the other players and then he gets into the game and immediately commit a penalty.  The penalty stumped the momentum well atleast temporarily it did.  It is a reminder that Irving is still around.

Are you referring to his 3rd to last snap right before the 2min warning of the 4th quarter? At that point we were in clock killing mode and ready to settle for a field goal. Not sure I'd call it a momentum killer. Also that was his 17th snap played. 

 

DJ had a drive killer false start when we were on the Seahawks 11 yard line, maybe thats what you are thinking of?

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Those extra linemen in on a semi-regular basis are making a huge impact on the games, no pun intended. We are just clobbering the other d-line and linebackers with them.

And sooner or later, one of those big boys is going to sneak out on a pass play since they are having to report in as eligible receivers every time. Just the possibility of that puts some weird wrinkles into defending us.

 

Don't forget that the pounding were putting on is paying huge dividends in the 4th quarter. when was the last time you remember us literally running the ball down an opponents throat in the 4th quarter without them being able to do anything about it.  It's because of the first half pounding.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, RumHam said:

Can someone explain why he was in? Moton sucks but this guy quickly reminds you of the upgrade to moton, who is clearly the weak link this year and shows just how historically bad it was under rhule

Do they have a post office in your world?

Local government? 

Or is everything just run by the pink elephants and giant snowmen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, cookinbrak said:

WE'RE DOING SOMETHING THAT SEEMS TO WORK WELL!! WHY?? WHY, I ASK???

Because the narrative and base for Wilks to get HC position is coming to fruition. The anti Wilks crowd is starting to get increasingly negative and making louder comments that show a lack of football knowledge. It has literally been draft position, questions about not trading good players, now comes the questionable nitpicking, and then it will be all out screaming look how he did in Arizona. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Eclipse said:

It was funny when they showed him(Irving) getting hyped up on the sideline with the other players and then he gets into the game and immediately commit a penalty.  The penalty stumped the momentum well atleast temporarily it did.  It is a reminder that Irving is still around.

Thought the same thing. Although I guess Wilks deserves credit for mixing it up and trying to get him some useful reps since we are paying him.

It will never not be embarrassing that Rhule really sought him and Elflein out as priority free agents on day 1...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, vorbis said:

Panthers have been using extra linemen to jumpstart the running game since Steve Wilks took over. when Erving is in he's usually the 6th or 7th lineman on the field. see Cade Mays at fullback last couple games. it's just to get better matchups in run block, that's it. get that 6th OL to block a linebacker at the point of attack. that's all.

Kinda how the cowboys ran all over us last year and we couldn't do anything about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Those extra linemen in on a semi-regular basis are making a huge impact on the games, no pun intended. We are just clobbering the other d-line and linebackers with them.

And sooner or later, one of those big boys is going to sneak out on a pass play since they are having to report in as eligible receivers every time. Just the possibility of that puts some weird wrinkles into defending us.

 

 

13 hours ago, rayzor said:

that's what i was going to point out. a big part of the reason they have been so successful with the run game is that they put the added beef up front. Front 7s are just overwhelmed.

 

13 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Those extra linemen in on a semi-regular basis are making a huge impact on the games, no pun intended. We are just clobbering the other d-line and linebackers with them.

And sooner or later, one of those big boys is going to sneak out on a pass play since they are having to report in as eligible receivers every time. Just the possibility of that puts some weird wrinkles into defending us.

 

Add to the fact that modern NFL teams have really become lighter to defend the pass and it's why it has worked so well. The LBs these days are basically SS 10 years ago so those boys just eat them up. Got to give McAdoo credit. Hes playing 1998 football against teams trying to play 2022 ball. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Snake said:

Add to the fact that modern NFL teams have really become lighter to defend the pass and it's why it has worked so well. The LBs these days are basically SS 10 years ago so those boys just eat them up. Got to give McAdoo credit. Hes playing 1998 football against teams trying to play 2022 ball. 

what we're doing to others is what was done to us the last couple years. 

we kept getting bullied, but it was "ok" because it was part of rhule's plan or something like that. 

wilks gets in charge and we start becoming the bullies.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...