Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Erving


RumHam
 Share

Recommended Posts

It was funny when they showed him(Irving) getting hyped up on the sideline with the other players and then he gets into the game and immediately commit a penalty.  The penalty stumped the momentum well atleast temporarily it did.  It is a reminder that Irving is still around.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Eclipse said:

It was funny when they showed him(Irving) getting hyped up on the sideline with the other players and then he gets into the game and immediately commit a penalty.  The penalty stumped the momentum well atleast temporarily it did.  It is a reminder that Irving is still around.

Are you referring to his 3rd to last snap right before the 2min warning of the 4th quarter? At that point we were in clock killing mode and ready to settle for a field goal. Not sure I'd call it a momentum killer. Also that was his 17th snap played. 

 

DJ had a drive killer false start when we were on the Seahawks 11 yard line, maybe thats what you are thinking of?

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Those extra linemen in on a semi-regular basis are making a huge impact on the games, no pun intended. We are just clobbering the other d-line and linebackers with them.

And sooner or later, one of those big boys is going to sneak out on a pass play since they are having to report in as eligible receivers every time. Just the possibility of that puts some weird wrinkles into defending us.

 

Don't forget that the pounding were putting on is paying huge dividends in the 4th quarter. when was the last time you remember us literally running the ball down an opponents throat in the 4th quarter without them being able to do anything about it.  It's because of the first half pounding.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, RumHam said:

Can someone explain why he was in? Moton sucks but this guy quickly reminds you of the upgrade to moton, who is clearly the weak link this year and shows just how historically bad it was under rhule

Do they have a post office in your world?

Local government? 

Or is everything just run by the pink elephants and giant snowmen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, cookinbrak said:

WE'RE DOING SOMETHING THAT SEEMS TO WORK WELL!! WHY?? WHY, I ASK???

Because the narrative and base for Wilks to get HC position is coming to fruition. The anti Wilks crowd is starting to get increasingly negative and making louder comments that show a lack of football knowledge. It has literally been draft position, questions about not trading good players, now comes the questionable nitpicking, and then it will be all out screaming look how he did in Arizona. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Eclipse said:

It was funny when they showed him(Irving) getting hyped up on the sideline with the other players and then he gets into the game and immediately commit a penalty.  The penalty stumped the momentum well atleast temporarily it did.  It is a reminder that Irving is still around.

Thought the same thing. Although I guess Wilks deserves credit for mixing it up and trying to get him some useful reps since we are paying him.

It will never not be embarrassing that Rhule really sought him and Elflein out as priority free agents on day 1...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, vorbis said:

Panthers have been using extra linemen to jumpstart the running game since Steve Wilks took over. when Erving is in he's usually the 6th or 7th lineman on the field. see Cade Mays at fullback last couple games. it's just to get better matchups in run block, that's it. get that 6th OL to block a linebacker at the point of attack. that's all.

Kinda how the cowboys ran all over us last year and we couldn't do anything about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Those extra linemen in on a semi-regular basis are making a huge impact on the games, no pun intended. We are just clobbering the other d-line and linebackers with them.

And sooner or later, one of those big boys is going to sneak out on a pass play since they are having to report in as eligible receivers every time. Just the possibility of that puts some weird wrinkles into defending us.

 

 

13 hours ago, rayzor said:

that's what i was going to point out. a big part of the reason they have been so successful with the run game is that they put the added beef up front. Front 7s are just overwhelmed.

 

13 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Those extra linemen in on a semi-regular basis are making a huge impact on the games, no pun intended. We are just clobbering the other d-line and linebackers with them.

And sooner or later, one of those big boys is going to sneak out on a pass play since they are having to report in as eligible receivers every time. Just the possibility of that puts some weird wrinkles into defending us.

 

Add to the fact that modern NFL teams have really become lighter to defend the pass and it's why it has worked so well. The LBs these days are basically SS 10 years ago so those boys just eat them up. Got to give McAdoo credit. Hes playing 1998 football against teams trying to play 2022 ball. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Snake said:

Add to the fact that modern NFL teams have really become lighter to defend the pass and it's why it has worked so well. The LBs these days are basically SS 10 years ago so those boys just eat them up. Got to give McAdoo credit. Hes playing 1998 football against teams trying to play 2022 ball. 

what we're doing to others is what was done to us the last couple years. 

we kept getting bullied, but it was "ok" because it was part of rhule's plan or something like that. 

wilks gets in charge and we start becoming the bullies.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...