Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nebraska fans have fully drank the Rhule Kool-Ade and think the Panthers are the reason he failed.


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think Rhule failed to notice the rule changes and what a different world college football is now and will be with all this transfer portal and imaging money scenario. 
Doesn’t it throw a wrench into the traditional recruiting process where your level of graft could have as large an effect on your recruiting effort? 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, hepcat said:

I guess these corn-fed bumpkins are so desperate for any kind of success they are willing to overlook the fact Matt Rhule’s Baylor teams never beat a ranked team in his time as head coach. The record wasn’t any better at Temple. 

Wonder how many big games he loses before they turn?   He's gonna get destroyed in the Big 10.  He'll get exposed when half the conference is ranked in the top 25. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s kind of embarrassing that “panther fans” are still taking shots at him on Twitter. I seen some of the comments and it’s cringe worth . Ok we get it, it didn’t work out in Carolina so we moved on and so did he. Wish him good luck in Nebraska . I just moved from nebraska and they are hungry for success

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

Am I the only one here that still wishes failure on Rhule? He’s such an asswipe that he doesn’t deserve well-wishes 

Nope. I wish nothing good on him or them. Nothing to respect or like about him.

Now it's he was a good school coach...not really. Little to no meaningful knowledge of the sport, relies on the skill of his underlings to do any footballing and wants to do anything but coach. The only positive I can give him is that his hustling ability will help him recruit at that level.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Darnold is basically a really high level game manager. Put him on a good team where he isn't required to provide lift and he can shine. But when you need him to do the franchise QB thing and put the team in his back here comes the INTs. He just doesn't seem to have any positions on his dial between "super conservative take whatever's there and take care of the ball" and "YOLO!!! There's a receiver down there somewhere in that sea of defenders!"
    • See, it's posts like this that show me how many of you are taking my post as an anti Dowdle post and saying he didn't have a good game, but that's the furthest thing from my intention and what I'm trying to say. Because that's the comparison you're making with Bryce, it's adding or removing a small handful of plays from their stats and saying "this is the game they could have had instead" I'm literally only talking about the play calling from the game, it's literally in the title of the thread, that we still have play calling problems. I'm saying that people are going to get stuck on the 200 yard rushing game by a player and extrapolate that to "well Canales must have called a good game" and I'm trying to say not to fall for that mirage. Because 6 big runs do not make for a well called game when we had over 60 snaps. Even beyond that, if you add in the two 20+ yard catches from T-Mac and the one XL had, and you're looking at 9 of over 60 snaps that accounted for close to 60% of our yards in the game. That's a few big plays covering up for coaching deficiencies, that's NOT a well called 60 minutes of football. Had he had the 200 yards because Canales' play calling was keeping the defense on their heels, not knowing what we were doing next, and Dowdle was ripping of 8-12 yard runs on a consistent basis, then yea, that would be something to be excited about with Canales finally calling a good game for a change. Our offense is predictable and the play design is basic, there is nothing I've seen out of Canales' offense that says he's able to scheme and call plays to outsmart the defense, which is something all the elite offensive coaches are able to do in this day and age.
    • Dante Moore is the top pick in a couple of mock drafts now. 
×
×
  • Create New...