Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How much to move up to #2 in Draft?


bLACKpANTHER
 Share

Recommended Posts

Throw the draft value chart out. Per the chart, our 1st and 3rd. But the Niners spent three 1sts and a 3rd to go to #3 and per the chart it should've taken their 1st, 2nd and maybe a 6th. When it's for a QB and the phone is ringing the bidding goes wild quickly.

I fully expect the Bears to put that pick on the block if teams are clamoring for Young and Stroud.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

23 minutes ago, bLACKpANTHER said:

Not sure how the Draft Value Charts work.. how much would it cost to move up from #9 to #2?

Would our 2nd rounder do the job?

In order to move up for Goff Titans gave up # 15, two 2nds, 3rd and the next seasons 1st and 3rd

 

in order to move up from #6 to #2. WAS gave up #6 and their next 2 years first round picks for RG3

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too much. Our 1st, Burns and more? 

I would rather take a shot on an imperfect and less rated prospect who is paired with a HC with QB grooming abilities. Neither Allen or Mahhomes went top 5. If we had the right coach I would care less that we are not picking top 2. 

I don't want to see us do a Lance type trade. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

That's the problematic part.

The problematic part is status quo, continuing to dumpster dive for reclamation projects. Can’t be scared to take a shot on someone. If not, we stay where we are for the foreseeable future. 

Edited by Knaakedup
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. It was an obvious red flag that a lot of people ignored. The results/scores in preseason don’t matter, but individual performance very much does and individually, we looked like the least talented team in the league and it carried over.
    • Sorry, but in 2015, we didn’t look like poo to the extent of 2023. People who said it’s just preseason were completely wrong. Simple as that. 2015 was a veteran lead team. It was Cam’s 5th year and Luke’s 4th. Even our OL was 80% the same (added Oher) as the great run to finish 2014 with a playoff win. That year can be labeled as preseason doesn’t matter because I’m sure we rested vets and well, Ron/Mike weren’t putting in special plays, etc. I absolutely don’t recall a bunch of us saying that Turner was getting killed on one on ones or that Luke was completely out of position or that Norman was hurt again but probably fine. The only thing that was right about the 2023 preseason is that the minority of us who saw it, were correct that we A) should have been making Young and others play 100% of the reps as there was nothing to hide and B) the preseason means nothing was a bunch of BS trying to stay optimistic when it was obvious that we had way less good talent than the rest of the NFL.
    • You are telling me Paul Maurice is a better coach than Rod??? Yes!!!  It’s because he plays a better system and has a better goalie.   Our system sucks in playoffs and he refuses to roll with Koochie. Dallas cowboys level poo 
×
×
  • Create New...