Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marc Ryan: Wilks Unlikely To Be Next HC. Tepper has Affinity for Demeco Ryans.

TylerDurden

By TylerDurden,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Stuart Smith Veteran

Stuart Smith

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

Ryans should have a good network to pry from and be an attractor for players.  One of the few DCs I'd be cool with.  

https://www.nbcsports.com/bayarea/49ers/why-nick-bosa-considers-49ers-demeco-ryans-best-d-coordinator-nfl-career

Brian Griese and James Cregg could both be options on offense.  

Wilkes has a lot of relationships across the league. Give him a chance to see who he would hire as O.C. This will be the 2nd time he was screwed over.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaRideorDie Veteran

CarolinaRideorDie

Posted
Posted

Our next HC being defensive minded isn't a deal breaker. We've seen the genius OC Hackett and McDaniels do poorly as HC. Some guys just don't have it to lead men and that is the greatest quality of a HC. This team has played harder and better under Wilks, I just hope our future HC can settle to the QB situation once and for all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPF4LIFE Grand Master

CPF4LIFE

Posted
Posted

Lol....i know this, you cant be all for bringing in a new HC and at same time be all for bringing Darnold back. Nobody is going to want to attach their job to him and why would they? I like wilks but if its a new HC it just reinforces a new QB is coming in as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Stuart Smith said:

Wilkes has a lot of relationships across the league. Give him a chance to see who he would hire as O.C. This will be the 2nd time he was screwed over.

He screwed himself over by getting run over by the Bengals and the Steelers and losing to the Bucs (not going for it on 4th and short and leaving his CBs in Cover 3). 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jon Snow
      2026 NFL Combine Thread: 2.26.26 - 3.1.26

      By Jon Snow · Posted

      I think the first 3 picks will be defensive players this time. At least that's how the draft is falling this year. I would not be shocked at all if our 1st pick is the number one safety in the draft. It appears he will be right there for the taking. 
    • strato
      2026 NFL Combine Thread: 2.26.26 - 3.1.26

      By strato · Posted

      Man oh man. That 8-9 record without a playoff berth puts at 13 if I recall, ahead of both Atlanta and TB with their 8-9 records, due to our weaker SOS.   We might have been in range to deal for that guy. I hope he doesn’t last to 8. And I hope some AFC team picks him. 
    • strato
      2026 NFL Combine Thread: 2.26.26 - 3.1.26

      By strato · Posted

      Cool. I am not wanting to debate or argue it. It is mostly my preferences. But a couple of things:  I just don’t think he sees the middle of the field well. But besides that I would rather spend a 1st round pick at different offensive positions if we went offense, otherwise we have neglected defense something fierce the last few years. Last 1st rounder was Horn. That’s like 5 years ago now.   Investments… gee the last 4 drafts we have used a 2, a 2, a low 1st and a top ten pick on WR. Bryce has been here three years, three of those picks were specifically for him.  And assets, I don’t think you are counting the haul we gave for the QB position. That counts and it was huge.   Add that up and add the Burns cap space we freed up when we traded him. We bought two guards and used the savings on them. Not on the defense.  I mean, that is a lot of investment in the offense when you put all that in a sack and weigh it.    peace. Appreciate your post.   
×
×
  • Create New...