Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Barnwell: Ranking NFL's best potential head coach openings for 2023


UNCrules2187
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, UNCrules2187 said:

The Panthers don't have much cap room after a series of restructures, but they likely will go down the Saints' path of creating short-term space around a promising young core. It's one thing to restructure wideout Michael Thomas after nearly two years out of football and another to trust that receiver DJ Moore, offensive tackle Taylor Moton and linebacker Shaq Thompson will be significant contributors for the next several seasons. A new deal for star edge rusher Brian Burns will also create cap space.

It is actually pretty insane how much cap space we can create due to our down the line flexibility. You can add ~20 million off of just two players (not named Brian Burns) alone. 

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where is that thread that was basically “sky r falling”

I fully believe that Wilks helped make this attractive because of Matt was still here we’d be looking at 3-14 but “not attractive” because you get the “no talent” moniker because we would be losing games 30-10 like San Fran.

Edited by Panthercougar68
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the article, Barnwell linked to an old Grantland article from 2015 that showed the record of interim HCs who were then promoted to full time HC: https://grantland.com/the-triangle/nfl-week-8-picks-the-weight-of-the-interim-label/

Coach Year Team Pre-Interim Post-Interim Future Years Future Records
Bruce Coslet 1996 Bengals 1-6 7-2 4 14-37
Dave McGinnis 2000 Cardinals 2-5 1-8 3 16-32
Dick LeBeau 2000 Bengals 0-3 4-9 2 8-24
Jason Garrett 2010 Cowboys 1-7 5-3 9 80-64
Jeff Fisher 1994 Oilers 1-9 1-5 16 141-115
Leslie Frazier 2010 Vikings 3-7 3-3 3 18-29-1
Mike Singletary 2008 49ers 2-5 5-4 2 13-18
Mike Tice 2001 Vikings 5-10 0-1 4 32-32
Richard Williamson 1990 Buccaneers 5-8 1-2 1 3-13
Romeo Crennel 2011 Chiefs 5-8 2-1 1 2-14
Tom Cable 2008 Raiders 1-3 4-8 2 13-19
    Record 26-71 33-46   340-397-1
    Win% 0.268 0.418   0.461

 

Note that I updated the table to include the full results of Garrett's tenure with Dallas. The only additions to the above since then would be Mike Mularkey in Tennessee and Doug Marrone which would be:

Coach Year Team Pre-Interim Post-Interim Future Years Future Records
Mike Mularkey 2015 Titans 1-6 2-7 2 18-14
Doug Marrone 2016 Jaguars 2-12 1-1 4 22-42
                                   Record  29-89          36-54                                   380-453-1         
    Win% 0.246 0.400   0.456

 

This is one of the things that gives me pause about hiring Wilks as the full time HC. It just historically hasn't worked well. The only ones that I'd say are decent to good are Fisher and Garrett and neither struck me as great HCs. I actually feel like Wilks would probably be in the same realm as those guys...occasional playoff runs with a bunch of medicore seasons.

 

Edited by UNCrules2187
  • Pie 5
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

we do a very talents young core...adding a QB and someone who knows how to use him could turn this team around quickly.

Stud WR?  check

Stud DE?  check

Stud CB?  check

Stud LT?  check.

Stud DT? check

Offensive line?  check

adding a QB to this group and we are set for years of winning....and we have plenty of picks to add to this team, very appealing to a new coach.  Just need that QB.

Compared to the other teams on that list, yeah we look pretty good.

Meddling owner?  check.  This could be the problem.  We'll see

 

  • Pie 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:

we do a very talents young core...adding a QB and someone who knows how to use him could turn this team around quickly.

Stud WR?  check

Stud DE?  check

Stud CB?  check

Stud LT?  check.

Stud DT? check

Offensive line?  check

adding a QB to this group and we are set for years of winning....and we have plenty of picks to add to this team, very appealing to a new coach.  Just need that QB.

Compared to the other teams on that list, yeah we look pretty good.

Meddling owner?  check.  This could be the problem.  We'll see

 

This is what I've been saying about the roster. We have a young stud at every key position outside of QB. 

  • Pie 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This is what I've been saying about the roster. We have a young stud at every key position outside of QB. 

Which is why the time is now to go get your guy

At some point all these guys are going to need to be paid. Burns is up now. Brown next. 

Go out and get your QB this offseason while you still have 4 seasons of Ekwonu’s rookie deal left

5 year rookie QB contract + 4 years left on a rookie LT contract… that puts you in a fantastic spot. Add in the fact we have a good OL and other important positions covered… those are reasons for optimism 

Edited by *FreeFua*
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, UNCrules2187 said:

ESPN+ article, but some interesting nuggets. Here's the order and some snippets:

7. Colts

6. Broncos

5. Cardinals

4. Commanders

3. Texans

2. Saints

1. Panthers

 

 

 

 

I’m confused. I thought  coaches vying for 1 of 32 nfl coaching jobs on the planet would opt for a Wal Mart greeting positions instead cause our owner is a billionaire with an ego.  
 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

It is actually pretty insane how much cap space we can create due to our down the line flexibility. You can add ~20 million off of just two players (not named Brian Burns) alone. 

Whats insane to me about our cap situation next year (as it stands now) is that we are right up against it, and the only QB we have under contract is Corral on a 3rd round rookie deal.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I suspect Coker can be better, but I haven't seen much evidence of Horn actually being better. Nuanced route running should not be taken lightly. If Horn ever reached the highest height that Renfrow has, I will be surprised. Coker may be able to do it, but it's certainly not a guarantee. I realize that Renfrow has been out of the game a few years, but I have seen evidence of him being his old self. That's also no guarantee, but I'm not certain that we'll ever be able to see any of these guysbteach their ceiling under the current circumstances.
    • Renfrow basically is exactly who we thought he was.   He is a niche slot WR. But he doesn't fit the O or Bryce though.  Renfrow needs a pretty good QB and scheme to be of use.  Bryce Young flat can't even hit him when he is open.  Folks saying Renfrow hasn't been good or washed are letting Bryce defense get in the way.  It's also just denying reality we watched on the field of him being wide open over and over and Bryce not being able to hit the broad side of a barn.  He probably has the best hands on the team though.  He is the best short/classic slot route runner on the team and it's not really close.  but we need to be developing Tmac, XL, Coker, Tremayne and Horn.  I'd say only 2 guys are technically better than Renfrow right now in a vaccum and that is Tmac and Coker. 
    • That's basically how I see it. He's obviously not washed. I've watched at least three vids showing how he was open and Bryce missing him. I've also seen evidence of him still putting people in a blender. But, if Bryce is going to miss him and Canales isn't going to use him, we may as well see what the young guys can do. 
×
×
  • Create New...