Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So which QB do we think will be available at #9?

NAS

By NAS,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Soul Rebel Experienced

Soul Rebel

Posted
Posted

I think everyone assumes CHI finds a dance partner to trade out of 1. I think the Bears set the comp too high and nobody moves into that slot. CHI isn't taking a QB, so Indy should be fine at 4 unless they are dead-set on "their guy". 

  • 1 - Chicago stays put and takes BPA (Anderson or Carter),
  • 2 - Houston takes Young
  • 3 - Arizona takes BPA (Anderson or Carter)
  • 4- Indy takes Levis 
  • 5 - Seattle likes to trade back and Fitts taps into his old team to jump Vegas for a QB

We take Stroud at 5, give up our 60th pick, 2023 4th and a 2024 3rd to move up to 5. Still have our 40th overall and our third rounder this year to add a couple of starters.  

To answer OPs question, I think the only QB that's available at 9 is Richardson.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mage Grand Master

Mage

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

 

Respect for him if he returns to Ohio State to win the national championship.  And if that is what he wants to do, he should 100% do it.

But I really really really hope he thinks it through.  You never know what can happen.  And while I do think since he plays QB, an injury wouldn't hurt him as much as it would others at another position (Tua still went top 5)... you never know.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted (edited)

Once AR15 and Levis go through the post season workout activities BOTH could also go before we pick.  They should impress people and there are a lot of teams looking to restart at QB.  If that does happen we will probably be forced to take BPA and wait another year if we don’t trade up.

I think we will trade up and everyone better hope we get the right guy.  It will be really expensive in term of assets.
 

 

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, Soul Rebel said:

I think everyone assumes CHI finds a dance partner to trade out of 1. I think the Bears set the comp too high and nobody moves into that slot. CHI isn't taking a QB, so Indy should be fine at 4 unless they are dead-set on "their guy". 

  • 1 - Chicago stays put and takes BPA (Anderson or Carter),
  • 2 - Houston takes Young
  • 3 - Arizona takes BPA (Anderson or Carter)
  • 4- Indy takes Levis 
  • 5 - Seattle likes to trade back and Fitts taps into his old team to jump Vegas for a QB

We take Stroud at 5, give up our 60th pick, 2023 4th and a 2024 3rd to move up to 5. Still have our 40th overall and our third rounder this year to add a couple of starters.  

To answer OPs question, I think the only QB that's available at 9 is Richardson.

This is what I'm thinking as well.  

That scenario could even happen if Indy trades to 1.  I just don't see anyone between us and SEA being THAT aggressive for a QB.  Raiders seem to be targeting vets, ATL has Ridder and could be a Carr candidate, SEA and DET may stand pat.  And it would be a fortune for anyone to move that high further down than us.  

The first 4 could shuffled around but still think it could be Anderson, Carter, Levis & Young in any particular order.  

What it all comes back to is this Young, Stroud, Levis debate for the teams.  The scenario operates under the assumption Indy and/or HOU will favor Levis over Stroud.  But if we really want to secure a guy, if and Chicago doesn't move, I think we may have to trade with Arizona and not rely on Indy screwing up.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, Mage said:

Respect for him if he returns to Ohio State to win the national championship.  And if that is what he wants to do, he should 100% do it.

But I really really really hope he thinks it through.  You never know what can happen.  And while I do think since he plays QB, an injury wouldn't hurt him as much as it would others at another position (Tua still went top 5)... you never know.  

That would be insane. 

If he doesn't go for the draft, wonder if it makes Cameron Ward declare.  With the amount of guy returning, that could assure a guy like Ward to be QB3 or 4 off the board.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LinvilleGorge
      Mini camp tweets

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      That's certainly what we hope but c'mon... stating it as fact when he's never played a down of NFL football? 
    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      What?!?!?! Chark's 1,000 yard season was 4 years before he played for us and he only had 525 yards in 15 games as our #1 WR.  Dude has 3,100 yards in 7 seasons, he's the literal definition of a JAG and you think he is better than half our current WR room? T-Mac is literally already better than Chark was at his peak, which again, was years before he ever even put on a Panthers uniform, and there is a real argument to be made that XL and Coker were both better as rookies than Chark was for us in his one season here.
    • Seltzer
      The Franchise guy Panthers 2025 deep dive overview

      By Seltzer · Posted

      Im glad we're starting low. It's nonsensical to put us at 28 IMHO based on objective things IMHO (I think 21-24) is far more appropriate but whatever. Washington was at the bottom last year FWIW.  In 2003, Sports Illustrated said our best chance to win the division was to transfer to the ACC. In 2015, everyone wrote us off as a team that snuck into the playoffs with a losing record in 2014 and lost our best WR in TC (Kelvin Benjamin). All these videos are fodder for conversation, but this prediction has no more validity than saying the Panthers are making the SB bc we're starting the season against the Jaguars again. If Bryce plays like he did down the stretch we will end up the season just fine. This roster is much better than it has been the last 2 seasons. No one knows who any season will ultimately end up, but this team is finally being built in the right way, and the idea that this roster can't compete this year is as insane as being it was when we were gaslit in 2023 that we were a rookie QB from winning the division with that roster.  
×
×
  • Create New...