Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Wilks had made adjustments in the Bucs game


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

58 minutes ago, YourLastThought said:

For everyone that says we must have an offensive minded coach how do you feel about Sean McDermont and the success he has had? Should the Bills fire him for one of the offensive guru guys?

Guys has a franchise QB and he has proven he is great at building his team. 
Also he has learned. When he first started with the Bills he was Rivera-like conservative, but over time he learned he has to be aggressive in this league and it worked out. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, YourLastThought said:

For everyone that says we must have an offensive minded coach how do you feel about Sean McDermont and the success he has had? Should the Bills fire him for one of the offensive guru guys?

McD has shown he will adapt and that's what has made him successful. Ron, Fox, even Rhule were all so ridiculously stubborn that the idea of changing anything must have sent them into a tirade. The one defensive guy I think could buck that trend right now is Ryans. He's young and really in tune with the creative aspect of the game, in part I imagine because of who is on the other side of the ball. I just don't see Steve in that same category. 27 years and still no back to back winning seasons. It's time to do something different. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's unfair to put what happened in that game entirely on him.  He isn't dealing with a staff he hired, he was coaches down on defense.  He lost CMC.  The team overachieved really down the stretch.  As with all NFL teams, their were injuries.  Out of desperation he signed JNO, but it was too little to late.  I think Steve may get a raw deal even if it isn't intentional.  I thought he did an exceptional job and there is no doubt he loves the Panthers.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TheMaulClaw said:

I think it's unfair to put what happened in that game entirely on him.  He isn't dealing with a staff he hired, he was coaches down on defense.  He lost CMC.  The team overachieved really down the stretch.  As with all NFL teams, their were injuries.  Out of desperation he signed JNO, but it was too little to late.  I think Steve may get a raw deal even if it isn't intentional.  I thought he did an exceptional job and there is no doubt he loves the Panthers.

He was coaches down on defence because he fired the v. good DC we had to put his best mate in place. 

The defence regressed week on week.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, OldhamA said:

He was coaches down on defence because he fired the v. good DC we had to put his best mate in place. 

The defence regressed week on week.

I don't think Phil Snow was fired.  Do you think Phil Snow would have stayed without Rhule?  I don't think so.

Edited by TheMaulClaw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Jmac said:

If Wilks had done anything to stop the three TD's to Evans and won that game,would he have been the front runner for the job?

Would you have agreed to keep him if they won the division and made the playoffs?

Did that Bucs came essentially seal his fate?...

 

Yes it sealed his fate.  Again, I love Wilks as a man and a leader from everything I know of him, but there was far too many examples in that one game of the inherent problems that were to come had he been hired as the permanent HC.  It was a painful lesson at the time, but it was better to be reminded of it now than for the next 2 or 3 years.

It sucks for him because I personally do believe he is one of the 32 best men for the job as a HC in the NFL.  But defensive-minded HCs are becoming a thing of the past.  The only ones that stand a chance to evolve with the league are the ones that are super assertive, proactive, and aggressive.  The only ones that fit that profile to me currently are Tomlin and Belichick a d even they are struggling without HOF QBs now.  Offense is the present and the future.  Period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I remember correctly Brees had a bunch of middling seasons until they got a defense. Peyton Manning won his Super bowls when the defense stepped up as well as the offense. The year he had so many TDs they didn't win it because the defense was poor. You can get to the playoffs with great defense or offense but to win the Superbowl you need all three phases to be playing at a high level. Folks here like the balls to the wall style play instead of more conservative play which can come from offensive or defensive guys. It just so happens most of our defensive coaches like Wilkes are conservative so offensive guys look appealing. But let's be real the OC who interviews needs to have a strong choice for DC and if he is smart a guy with head coaching experience.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure who said it first, but Tepper is the correct answer. Still, I'm gonna go with Kasay keeping it inbounds. If, you subscribe to the butterfly effect version of time travel consequences.... When we win SBXXXVIII everybody's lives change: Moose never breaks his leg, We win it all again in 05. Tommy Jone is unknown and Peppers stays home, Champs once more 2008. No artificial pig heart turning JR into a creepy weirdo, no lockout, no Clausen. Fox and Jake ride off into the sunset on their own terms. No 2-14, no #1 pick. But, no laptop, no Blinn, 3 years behind The Golden Calf of Bristol, we still get Cam. JR let's him grow his locs like he always wanted, Smitty sees Cam in a new light. Dreads swinging, (and Smitty with his 3 Lombardis behind him) Cam is old enough to get those calls. No Manning narrative, Cotchery TD, PI against Talib on Philly Brown, 10,000 RTP calls and Kony Ealy SB50 MVP. No Jeans Fridays, no Tepper. KB doesn't slip on his own meatsweat mid-route in SD, Cam becomes the 1st QB to win 10 straight SBs. Retiring after being elected 47th president of the US of A, Cam ushers in the Permanent Proletarian Revolution across the globe, Xi Jinping bows in awe. "ẄøŘƙƐṛ§ őF ŧĤə ŵØRłð, ŮŊÏŦƐ!!!"
    • Yeah your right the owner was copping hand shandies while all this was going down 
    • I mean not surprised the Patriots took him in and aren't trying to push him out. They've been the most morally bankrupt team in the NFL for a long while. Wouldn't be surprised if Vrabel has his own dirt on Kraft/Brady and other assholes from that organization over the last couple decades. 
×
×
  • Create New...