Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trading for Sean Payton vs Settling for Steve Wilks


Trading for Sean Payton vs Settling for Steve Wilks  

91 members have voted

  1. 1. ?

    • Trading for Sean Payton
      64
    • Settling for Steve Wilks
      27


Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Kuhndog94 said:

Yall can keep Taysom Hill.

The only reason I mentioned Taysom is because, SP told M Loomis, “He wanted to take Taysom Hill with him.”

not sure why we would not want him.  Just because he played for the hated arch rival, doesn’t make him a bad player.  I am not saying we would want Taysom Hill.  I am saying he would be an excellent play if he works with SP.  I am not sure I would kick him off the football field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

I feel like "settling" is an appropriate word for how I would feel if we hire Steve Wilks. He's fine, but he ain't winning any championships.

it just feels like the 10-7, 6-11, 9-8, 4-13 road ahead would be set in stone for us

Edited by Growl
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 I am not a fan of giving division rivals extremely high draft picks for a their former coach. George Siefert comes to mind and we didn't have to give up high draft picks for him.  Personally, if feels like a Sean Payton money grab for him.  That's why I think he'll go to Denver .  Walton has deep pockets as well. Denver  Division  is tougher than our NFC South currently. But I don't think he cares. It's about a big pay day.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Night and day difference in the front office investements.  Since Morgan has been in the FO (5 years)....4 out of 5 first round picks have been offensive players.  The one defensive pick was a corner. Expand it out to the first 2 rounds? 7 out of the 9 picks have been offensive.  That IMO is why our D sucks so bad.   You build defenses up front.   Carolina hasn't been investing there.  Ron's first 5 years? 3 of the 5 first round picks were defensive players.  Expand it all to include second rounders  7 of the 10 picks were defensive.  All front 7 players.     
    • I think he gets this year to show what he can do.  Last year, we had a lot of injuries. This year, we should have some players, even if we lose one or two.  It's the first preseason game.  Some of the starters weren't even in it.  There is no scheming or game planning.  Let's see how guys do when it counts. I think we have a GM that knows a thing or two about defense.  Let it play out.
    • I was ok with the mentor aspect of keeping Dalton, but wow has he fallen off the deep end. The slow behind the WR interception was awful. I keep hearing our WRs created no separation, but on that particular play dude was wide open and Dalton couldn't get it to him with a clean pocket. Next year, we need to address the backup QB spot haaaaaard!
×
×
  • Create New...