Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Natalie Miller's mock draft 1.0


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, ncfan said:

And then sit and watch teams run all on us or sit back and pick us apart with their WR3 or TE with no pass rush.  While the offense struggles to score.

Free agency has better pass rush options than the draft imo, tho I like KJ Henry in the 3rd or 4th.

I don't see any likely available pass rushers in the 1st either that I think would have a bigger impact than Porter.

Edited by Icege
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm coming around to a CB in the first if a QB or DE aren't available.  

Donte and  JC have had multiple injuries, Henderson appears to be a bust (the poor guy has had 3 HC and 3 DC in his short career, with Rhule and Urban giving his intro to the NFL just about as bad a start as possible).

If we pick at 9, we have to get an impact player, and CB is one of those positions that impacts games.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much prefer a pass rusher to pair with Burns. Granted, I don't know much about this year's draft and prospects so not sure any make sense in the range we are picking. Get Carr as an actual good stopgap (unlike the shitty ones of the past 3 years) and let our new HC handpick his QB when he falls in love with one in a draft (kinda like Reid with Mahomes several years into his KC career), even if we need to trade up in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, t96 said:

Much prefer a pass rusher to pair with Burns. Granted, I don't know much about this year's draft and prospects so not sure any make sense in the range we are picking. Get Carr as an actual good stopgap (unlike the shitty ones of the past 3 years) and let our new HC handpick his QB when he falls in love with one in a draft (kinda like Reid with Mahomes several years into his KC career), even if we need to trade up in the future.

This class is absolutely loaded with edge talent 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much rather have some Dline help or just trade back then any DB.

Really not impressed with what we have gotten out of what we have spent on CB recently. First move Jackson for a pick or find one in the 3rd to 5th range that can contribute regularly before shooting for another top 10 CB pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/22/2023 at 6:20 PM, Icege said:

Free agency has better pass rush options than the draft imo, tho I like KJ Henry in the 3rd or 4th.

I don't see any likely available pass rushers in the 1st either that I think would have a bigger impact than Porter.

I think KJ is going to be rotational depth in the NFL.   He wasn't really dominant at Clemson and that was being in a great position to be.  Good DT play and a better DE across from him.   

Think this current crop coming out at Clemson is a step back from what they have been putting out into the NFL on the DL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/21/2023 at 12:47 PM, Verge said:

Thats how fitterer gets fired

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...