Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching Interviews: Round Two


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, CarolinaRideorDie said:

I think there is legitimate concern as he has talent on offense in Dallas. Dak, Zeke, Pollard, Lamb. Ben Johnson has who? Can Kellen Moore get the same production with less talent? 

I'm taking Goff over Dak right now....

Amon Ra is solid. I don't disagree with the sentiment, but #1 offense in year one? Can't tell me some part of this outrage is Cowboys related. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PantherFanInPhilly said:

Tons of fans want Wilks (not me). He's the one the majority of the Facebook Panther fans want. 

That should tell you a lot 

8 minutes ago, PantherKyle said:

I'm taking Goff over Dak right now....

Amon Ra is solid. I don't disagree with the sentiment, but #1 offense in year one? Can't tell me some part of this outrage is Cowboys related. 

I’m taking Detroit’s OL and Jamal Williams over Zeke as well

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OldNorthPowell said:

Wilks will play a boring, pound the football style offense that doesn't work in today's game. He will have a solid defense and a terrible offense. Go 10-24 in his first 2 years and get canned. Save this. Bookmark it. Ya heard it here first. 

But he's earned it! But he's from Charlotte! But the players love him! 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

So in other words we should hire him because you say so.

 

Why ask a question if you going to debate the answer.lol

 

What you want me to say hire Kellen Moore?

No, I'm saying you cannot use a candidates age as a determining factor unless it is a legitimate reason.  You not wanting an older coach is not a legitimate reason.  That candidate could sue your ass for discrimination based on that alone, and will win. Its a violation of federal law. I take it you've not been involved in hiring people or you would know this already. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Panthering said:

Rhule has nothing to do with this at all, college coaches tend to not work out. Taking a OC has yielded the best results in the NFL.

The simple fact of hiring a guy just bc he is an OC is simple. Maybe stating an offensive mind would make more sense when making your statement. 

All those guys are head coaches now who had to put together a staff. They don't just call plays.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why do we always let our good players go ?   CMC was injured and we let him go . Now we face him Monday night .  We know what Chuba can do . We know what Rico can do .  We signed Chuba so why not sign Rico .   we don't know what we have in Brooks ,  Let him and Eteine go at it in camp . Keep the better player .  Don't let your proven players leave .
    • Oh, I get it. I called him Peewee for the first couple of years. He is too small to be an NFL QB. It wasn't as much of a problem in college, even in the SEC, because every player in the NFL is the size and speed of the biggest 22 on your entire college team.  I was left scratching my head over the pick and what we traded to get him (and yes, that cost analysis is unavoidable). Now we're sunk into the third season and the kid just popped a frikkin' amazing game out there where he showed every mark of what you need in a top end QB. Great passing, mobility, guts, toughness (that ankle must have been killing him) and the ability to put a team on his back to claw back a win. He didn't win it with his arm so much as by getting the ball to the right people at the right time, but that is what the best do. Do I believe he's going to be our QB of the future here? I'm still out on that. Way out on that. But I'm at least intrigued. Can he replicate what he did or even get close? Can he perform well against the power opponents we have left on the schedule? Heck, can he even beat New Orleans this season?  Right now, my personal feeling is that he'd make a heck of a back-up QB. He could prove me wrong and excel, though. Maddening as it is, that'd be the best outcome ever. Or he could have just hit his peak. And that would be bittersweet because then we start the whole thing over again. I don't see a reclaimation project QB out there right now that Canales can work his magic on.
×
×
  • Create New...