Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching Interview Thread IV: A New Hope


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, ncfan said:

“The owner”

8FF38993-08A5-4E73-981C-2F0C3AA4B6DB.jpeg

52AF2A80-CD32-407D-8A6A-ECBDDAE1E1D0.jpeg

9B5F0510-0C38-4AF3-AA1C-12F3F9616A13.jpeg

So in nine seasons as a playcaller, his teams were in the top 10 four out of nine times. 4-5. I know top 10 is good and all ... but 4-5 could not be a more classic Panthers type number.

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's actually been revealed since the firing that Irsay dumped Reich specifically so that he could hire Saturday.

Irsay went so far as to say that if Saturday hadn't been available, he wouldn't have fired Reich.

Via a direct quote from Irsay? Or, another one of your Tweets?

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Depends on who you ask...

Albert Breer said he was still in the mix but Ian Rapoport reported he's out and has gone home.

Lay off the Twitter, Scot.

Edited by Brooklyn 3.0
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NJPanthers12 said:

i truly underestimated how damn stupid david tepper truly is. i went from thinking there was no shot wilks could be the choice, to now ill be pretty surprised if he isnt. this is going to be a dark day in panthers history. 

what-do-you-mean-by-that-druski.gif

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NJPanthers12 said:

i truly underestimated how damn stupid david tepper truly is. i went from thinking there was no shot wilks could be the choice, to now ill be pretty surprised if he isnt. this is going to be a dark day in panthers history. we are going begging for the george seifert days after we get done with the wilks era, which i will guarantee will not last more than 3 years. 

my new prediction is that the panthers will not be in charlotte in 15 years. tepper has zero respect for the fans. zero connection to the city. and we are about to see this fan base disappear like weve never seen before. you cant go from rhule to wilks. the smart fans wont pay and wont show up. this will give him more ammo to move the team. 

u got the inside scoop that its wilks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

People don't want to hear it but you are on the money with this in regards to Tepper’s process. Though at least with Reich we will see emphasis on the offense.

Okay, so who actually has a better resume than Reich?

I'd agree Tepper seems to be playing it safer with this hire relative to his last one, but I don't see how this is a poorly made choice made over meatballs or something. Reich has an impressive resume, he's just not as exciting to fans.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great thread, Ricky.

Sadly, although I like Reich as a person and really liked him as a player (as a young football junkie, I used to trade for Reich on NFL95 on Sega because he was the guy that led the NFL's largest comeback win and one of our first franchise QBs), I just find the hire to be extremely uninspiring.  He may be an offensive-minded coach, but he isn't one of the young guns everyone wanted, and he has a pretty strong, established history of the usual average results we've come to know and expect from our franchise.  He had what, 4 years as HC in Indy?  And he produced a winning percentage right in line with every coach in franchise history with 3 years or more of tenure - barely over .500.  I did love his work as an OC with the Chargers and Eagles, but his results as a HC speak to mote of the same that we're accustomed to.

On one hand, optimistically, I feel like 2 of his years as HC should be omitted because he was attempting to win with Matt fuging Ryan and Carson fuging Wentz.  With Luck and Rivers as his starters, he went a combined 21-11 those years.  But with anyone non-elite, he was extremely average, and that's what bothers me.  We want a transcendent coach whose schemes make even average players look good, and good players look great.  But instead, my feeling on Reich, is much like our past coaches, his success is far more dependent on the level of talent of his players than his players' production being enhanced by his schemes.

It just feels like an offensive version of more of the same.

  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

Great thread, Ricky.

Sadly, although I like Reich as a person and really liked him as a player (as a young football junkie, I used to trade for Reich on NFL95 on Sega because he was the guy that led the NFL's largest comeback win and one of our first franchise QBs), I just find the hire to be extremely uninspiring.  He may be an offensive-minded coach, but he isn't one of the young guns everyone wanted, and he has a pretty strong, established history of the usual average results we've come to know and expect from our franchise.  He had what, 4 years as HC in Indy?  And he produced a winning percentage right in line with every coach in franchise history with 3 years or more of tenure - barely over .500.

On one hand, optimistically, I feel like 2 of his years as HC should be omitted because he was attempting to win with Matt fuging Ryan and Carson fuging Wentz.  With Luck and Rivers as his starters, he went a combined 21-11 those years.  But with anyone non-elite, he was extremely average, and that's ehat bothers me.  We want a transcendent coach whose schemes make even average players look good, and good players look great.  But instead, my feeling on Reich, is much like our past coaches, his success is far more dependent on the level of talent of his players than his players' production being enhanced by his schemes.

It just feels like an offensive version of more of the same.

Yeah I'm not expecting much with Reich, but the benefit is that he'll swink or swim relatively fast. With Wilks it's .500 land for the next few years

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

The tweet says "this is my opinion" and you walked away with it as fact..... that's concerning./cdn-cgi/mirage/ff6543e8920235fbac05d88a86e121d55ab03587783d7290bbc89cb9eab219bc/1280/https://media1.giphy.com/media/pH6bOPv3NRePOlt5Qn/200.gif

Not talking about that tweet. It was talked about days ago by Panther beat reporters, shoot Quick did a dang interview on TV about it. 😂😂😂

 

 

 

Edited by carpanfan96
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

Great thread, Ricky.

Sadly, although I like Reich as a person and really liked him as a player (as a young football junkie, I used to trade for Reich on NFL95 on Sega because he was the guy that led the NFL's largest comeback win and one of our first franchise QBs), I just find the hire to be extremely uninspiring.  He may be an offensive-minded coach, but he isn't one of the young guns everyone wanted, and he has a pretty strong, established history of the usual average results we've come to know and expect from our franchise.  He had what, 4 years as HC in Indy?  And he produced a winning percentage right in line with every coach in franchise history with 3 years or more of tenure - barely over .500.

On one hand, optimistically, I feel like 2 of his years as HC should be omitted because he was attempting to win with Matt fuging Ryan and Carson fuging Wentz.  With Luck and Rivers as his starters, he went a combined 21-11 those years.  But with anyone non-elite, he was extremely average, and that's ehat bothers me.  We want a transcendent coach whose schemes make even average players look good, and good players look great.  But instead, my feeling on Reich, is much like our past coaches, his success is far more dependent on the level of talent of his players than his players' production being enhanced by his schemes.

It just feels like an offensive version of more of the same.

To be fair here, it's hard to assess how much a coach is making an average player elite vs a player taking himself to the next level with his own development. It's hard to untangle Belichick's success with Brady, Payton's success with Brees, Reid's success with Mahomes, etc. I think you can clearly point to someone like Kyle Shanahan in being able to elevate the level of play of his signal callers, but even then there are limits to that (Trey Lance has looked like an enormous bust). And like I said, Wentz, who's looked like an average bum under other coaches, had his best years and was playing at an MVP level early in his Philly tenure with Reich as his OC. 

But I totally understand why folks aren't excited by the hire if that's how it goes. I'll be happy with it if only because it's someone who is an offensive mind and not just a sentimental hire.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

It just feels like an offensive version of more of the same.

Because it is exactly that.

People are already chugging the kool-aid as a coping mechanism but anyone that expects to win with a hire like that is on some fun meds.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mav1234 said:

Okay, so who actually has a better resume than Reich?

I'd agree Tepper seems to be playing it safer with this hire relative to his last one, but I don't see how this is a poorly made choice made over meatballs or something. Reich has an impressive resume, he's just not as exciting to fans.

We've taken our time more sure but we went from saying it was going to be a small pool of candidates to bringing in just about anyone who would interview and now we are back to Wilks or a retread. And as far as I can tell no one has so much as given Wilks a call. Now people can speculate that has to do with his lawsuit and it's possible but I don't buy it. I can accept Reich as the head coach. Though he has cons like Wilks we can't overlook that. But again it is at least a new direction so I would wait and let things play out while hoping for the best.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Damn Ghost had a hell of a series then huh?
    • The much shorter and less number analytical version of the above is that the T-Mac pick wasn't about giving Bryce an alpha receiver this season that dominates the targets. It was about shifting the rest of the WRs down a peg in their role to give Bryce better options this year while giving us a true #1 to take over next year when Thielen retires or signs somewhere else. It's to let XL and Coker grow this year as the 3rd and 4th option instead of the 2nd and 3rd option, so that they are then ready to step into those increased roles in 2026.  While at the same time it's to allow T-Mac to get used to the NFL game without the pressure on him that those rookies last year had to be THE guy.   And that's not to say he can't be THE guy, it's just that if you don't HAVE to do that to your rookie, it's better for the entire team, no matter how good that rookie may or may not be.  Expectations are different than real possibilities. It's very POSSIBLE for T-Mac to get to 1k this year, but I think it's unfair to put that EXPECTATION on him leading into the season due to the other options Bryce will have at his disposal this year.
    • Did you read my post though, I very clearly pointed out why T-Mac is in a situation that is nothing remotely like those 4 last year, so let's try again.... Malik Nabers had 1,204 yards, the next 3 best pass catchers on that team... Wan'Dale Robinson (699 yards), Darius Slayton (573), Theo Johnson (331) Brian Thomas Jr had 1,282 yards, the next 3... Brenton Strange (411), Parker Washington (390), Christian Kirk (379) Ladd McConkey had 1,149 yards, the next 3... Quentin Johnston (711), Josh Palmer (584), Will Dissly (481) Bowers had 1,194 yards, the next 3... Jacoby Meyers (1,027), Tre Tucker (529), Alexander Mattisdon (294) I'm not going to pretend I'm an expert on the games of all those next 3 players behind rookies, but I don't think it's at all a stretch to say that Thielen, XL, and Coker next year will ALL be better than EVERY player on that list with the possible exception of Jacoby Meyers. If you can't see how having Thielen, XL, and Coker on the team will take more targets from T-Mac than Nabers, BTJ, Ladd, and Bowers had taken from them with the rest of their Top 4 options on their teams, then you're just fooling yourself. Even looking at 2 years ago, Puka was the only rookie to get there, and his next 3 leading receivers were Kupp (737 in 12 games), HIgbee (495), and Atwell (483).  But this was also with the team having 4,300 receiving yards too, and if we have 4,300 yards in the passing game this year, then yes, I don't care what anyone else gets, T-Mac better be getting 1,000 or it will be a bad season for him. If you can't see that putting expectations on T-Mac in a vacuum because of what past rookies have been able to do, without any regard to the players on the team around him, then that's on you, sorry. So for you then, it sounds like you expect those yard to come from Thielen's total and that's what gets T-Mac over the 1k mark, which is a totally fair and valid prediction or expectation. Again, I'm not saying I don't think T-Mac will get to 1,000 yards. I'm saying it's not fair to have that as the EXPECTATION for him going into the season when you look at the offensive talent we have this year. Those are two VERY different things. If you EXPECT XL or Coker to take a step back and not improve this year, or if you EXPECT Thielen to finally lose a step and not come close to the 1k yard mark himself, then yes, I think EXPECTING 1,000 yards from T-Mac is perfectly acceptable in any or all of those situations and I'd then agree with you myself. But I don't expect those things.   I do expect XL and Coker to continue to improve. I do expect Thielen to have one more season of being the same guy he has been for us the last 2 years.  He's averaged 60.3 yards per game in his two years here, which would be a 1,025 yard season in 17 games.   It's going to be VERY hard if not impossible for XL and Coker to improve, Thielen to be the same player for us, and T-Mac get to 1,000 yards all in the same season.  If all 4 of those things happen, then as I've said before, Bryce might be a legitimate MVP contender as it means he's putting up video game like numbers, as it's hard to have 4 WRs who all produce like that in one season. Your argument of T-Mac not getting to 1,000 meaning either he didn't work out or the offense didn't work out, isn't fair, as there is a very real possibility that the offense clicks, all 4 of those WRs work out, and because of it, all 4 of them have suppressed stats this year compared to what they might have been able to put up without one or more of the other guys on the same team.
×
×
  • Create New...