Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina willing to move Corral. Cost won’t be high.


Varking
 Share

Recommended Posts

Unless a team is just really stupid and gives us a 3rd rounder for him, I don't see the value in trading him, even more so if the NFL ends up adjusting their rules this year to allow for every team to dress an emergency 3rd QB without it counting towards the game day roster limits.

He's going to be better than almost any other 3rd stringer out there, so assuming we sign a vet to back up the rookie, I think his value is best as our 3rd stringer than trade him for a late round pick that is likely to get cut or IR'd in camp after breaking a toe nail.

Edited by tukafan21
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Unless a team is just really stupid and gives us a 3rd rounder for him, I don't see the value in trading him, even more so if the NFL ends up adjusting their rules this year to allow for every team to dress an emergency 3rd QB without it counting towards the game day roster limits.

He's going to be better than almost any other 3rd stringer out there, so assuming we sign a vet to back up the rookie, I think his value is best as our 3rd stringer than trade him for a late round pick that is likely to get cut or IR'd in camp after breaking a toe nail.

Trading Corral now or talking about trading him NOW is STUPID and a very Rhulesque thing to do. Dumb as sh*t because he has absolutely NO value until WE/THEY see him play at least in training camp. Awful strategic thinking over there at Mint Street.

We could have got a sh*tload from the Bears for Cam had we let him play in camp.

Same stupid mistake HERE.

 

DUMB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Jesse said:

That tells me that it was a Rhule pick. So disappointed that we essentially lost a 3rd round pick for nothing.

we traded up with BB, notice how rhule is pretty much the only person that would do business with him, BB rake him over so hard. Really wish we had that 3rd rounder for a replacement runningback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Jesse said:

That tells me that it was a Rhule pick. So disappointed that we essentially lost a 3rd round pick for nothing.

If you watch the Camp Confidential it's literally Rhule on the phone with Belichick, Tepper leaning over Fitts shoulder telling him to do it, and Fitt staring straight ahead like fug my life lol. 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have to be the sloppiest team of all time in regards to coveting draft capital. 
 

Trade a second for Darnold, Trade a third for Henderson, Trade the package we did to move up to 1, trade a 4th last year and 3rd this year to get a QB that we gave like 7 snaps to, trade a sixth for Gilmore (albeit a great move) just to never use em. 
 

So much waste.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...