Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Get the WR's now, use 2nd pick for defense


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

Personal opinion is that they need to get the WR's in FA (trade for Hopkins and sign Chark). Use the 2nd for a player that could add pressure in the new 3-4 scheme.

Who to trade for Hopkins is debatable, but having those two on board this year would solve many issues on the offense.

This draft has big guys with speed that could be MOVED AROUND/HYBRED type player with size and speed which would add much needed pressure. A missing piece in the defense for sure.

 

Edited by Jmac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

EDGE is a definite spot for us to bolster, but with Burns, Luvu, Haynes, & Barno, I wonder if the better focus is a hand-in dirt chess piece on the line.  Keeanu Benton, Mazi Smith or Karl Brooks seem like the type I could see as a big fit.  

I will say, this draft is not top heavy but it is deep as heck with EDGE, RB, & TE.  This is one of the deeper EDGE classes in a minute so maybe we do take advantage.  

I could see us targeting a KJ Henry, Elijah McGuire, Byron Young, Tyler Lacy type with one of the 4ths.  

With this R2 consideration, there are 3 prospects that do make my eyebrow perk up: Felix, Ojulari, & Adebawore.  They seem hard to pass on.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jmac said:

Personal opinion is that they need to get the WR's in FA (trade for Hopkins and sign Chark). Use the 2nd for a player that could add pressure in the new 3-4 scheme.

Who to trade for Hopkins is debatable, but having those two on board this year would solve many issues on the offense.

This draft has big guys with speed that could be MOVED AROUND/HYBRED type player with size and speed which would add much needed pressure. A missing piece in the defense for sure.

 

Trade for Hopkins and we no longer than have that second pick.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jmac said:

Personal opinion is that they need to get the WR's in FA (trade for Hopkins and sign Chark). Use the 2nd for a player that could add pressure in the new 3-4 scheme.

Who to trade for Hopkins is debatable, but having those two on board this year would solve many issues on the offense.

This draft has big guys with speed that could be MOVED AROUND/HYBRED type player with size and speed which would add much needed pressure. A missing piece in the defense for sure.

 

You're not going to get both Hopkins and Chark.  Personally I think they should sign Chark and draft another.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As disillusioned as I am with the WRs in this draft as early as early round 2, I might agree with this, then in the third round, trade up for WR Charlie Jones--I am high on him, and he seems to be ready to play day 1.  I think he is a sleeper.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Spotrac, Chark has a value estimated at $9.5m.  That is a bit high, considering where the others have fallen.  I think we will offer him a deal, in the 3-year, $22m range.

Don't forget, Hardman is still out there.

And I know everyone has already stamped a star on the side of his head, but Odell is out there too.   That should make some excited, others nervous.

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

On Spotrac, Chark has a value estimated at $9.5m.  That is a bit high, considering where the others have fallen.  I think we will offer him a deal, in the 3-year, $22m range.

Don't forget, Hardman is still out there.

And I know everyone has already stamped a star on the side of his head, but Odell is out there too.   That should make some excited, others nervous.

I have a hard time imagining Chark getting anything more than a 1 year deal from any other team 

Which is why our cap situation makes signings like this tough 

So for us we have to add years to fit these guys in and taking the majority of the hit next year 

Edited by *FreeFua*
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Jmac said:

Personal opinion is that they need to get the WR's in FA (trade for Hopkins and sign Chark). Use the 2nd for a player that could add pressure in the new 3-4 scheme.

Who to trade for Hopkins is debatable, but having those two on board this year would solve many issues on the offense.

This draft has big guys with speed that could be MOVED AROUND/HYBRED type player with size and speed which would add much needed pressure. A missing piece in the defense for sure.

 

Do we have the Cap Space for Hopkins? What are the Cardinals going to ask for? Obviously having Stroud, Hopkins, Sanders, Terrace Marshall, a slot that can stretch the field vertically, Hayden Hurst, etc. makes our offense very capable of contending this year in the NFC South and maybe the NFC in general. The Eagles lost a ton of players and two coaches, they will be lucky to get to .500 in my opinion. So the conference is wide ass open. 

Personally, I'd like to nab Nick Hampton out of App State if he's there on Day 3. OLB who can cover in space while also providing some elite bend off the edge to go with Burns on passing downs (6'3 240, which is the same as Will Anderson).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a bunch of slot receivers in the second round, but no real #1 WRs worthy of that pick. We need to either trade back up into the 1st round for a #1, or trade for a WR from some other team, or get a FA. One of these things is going to happen imo. The again, Fitt just foolishly restructured Jackson so he might do something else stupid with the WR situation.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...