Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anthony Richardson “knocked” S2 cognitive test “out of the park”.


DFive
 Share

Recommended Posts

According to the article, Bryce Young scored the highest at 93. Interestingly enough, it also mentions Will Levis as scoring high as well. No mention of CJ Stroud or his score or if he even took it. For reference, Brock Purdy scored in the mid 90’s last year. 
 

 

Edited by DFive
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Allegedly all 4 of the top QBs this year did very well on the test, with Young being a bit ahead of the other 3.

I'm not hanging to much on this test quite yet tho, it sounds better than the wonderlic but notice how only the hits are being leaked. I'm willing to bet that there are a few that scored high but haven't done well in the NFL and some that did poorly or average and are doing decently. Gotta see all the test takers and their current status in the league.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

S2 test may seem laughable but I don’t think it’s something you can practice or get better at. Either your brain can process visual information quickly or it can’t. 
 

it’s encouraging for AR15 and his future development. He reminds me of Josh Allen, he was also raw but was in a good situation to develop. 
 

Does anyone know what CJ’s score is? 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe Haener was the other QB in the 90s. 

Unrelated but I do feel strongly that he’ll be an asset for a team. Perfect backup that has starter potential down the road.

He secured himself a R3-4 selection at his pro day and possibly the next QB taken after Hooker.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

I just don't want us to spend our pick chasing Cam Newton 2.0. There's only one Cam and we aren't resurrecting him with this pick.

Agreed but we also shouldn’t ignore any prospect that has a similar playing style as Cam. Just grade them all on an equal playing field and if the one who reminds fans of Cam makes the most sense then draft him. I’m not saying this is the case this year.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

I believe Haener was the other QB in the 90s. 

Unrelated but I do feel strongly that he’ll be an asset for a team. Perfect backup that has starter potential down the road.

He secured himself a R3-4 selection at his pro day and possibly the next QB taken after Hooker.

Haener has been your guy for a while. I could see him finding some success in the league.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. It was an obvious red flag that a lot of people ignored. The results/scores in preseason don’t matter, but individual performance very much does and individually, we looked like the least talented team in the league and it carried over.
    • Sorry, but in 2015, we didn’t look like poo to the extent of 2023. People who said it’s just preseason were completely wrong. Simple as that. 2015 was a veteran lead team. It was Cam’s 5th year and Luke’s 4th. Even our OL was 80% the same (added Oher) as the great run to finish 2014 with a playoff win. That year can be labeled as preseason doesn’t matter because I’m sure we rested vets and well, Ron/Mike weren’t putting in special plays, etc. I absolutely don’t recall a bunch of us saying that Turner was getting killed on one on ones or that Luke was completely out of position or that Norman was hurt again but probably fine. The only thing that was right about the 2023 preseason is that the minority of us who saw it, were correct that we A) should have been making Young and others play 100% of the reps as there was nothing to hide and B) the preseason means nothing was a bunch of BS trying to stay optimistic when it was obvious that we had way less good talent than the rest of the NFL.
    • You are telling me Paul Maurice is a better coach than Rod??? Yes!!!  It’s because he plays a better system and has a better goalie.   Our system sucks in playoffs and he refuses to roll with Koochie. Dallas cowboys level poo 
×
×
  • Create New...