Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kuechly talking Bryce Young


poundaway
 Share

Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Kuechly is essentially saying what all of the 'haters' are saying - his best bet it to become a mini-Brees.

His path to success is dinking and dunking the ball out before pressure gets there. Those highlight plays in College where he scrambles to buy more time are going to get him killed in the NFL.

Y’all act like you never see NFL QBs buying time moving around and out of the pocket. 
 

Also, wouldn’t you take Drew Brees at #1 if you could have?

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

That's why I said it was accurate.  But if you're trying to argue not to worry about injuries, choosing CMC as your example is not a great choice, even if the nuances of the situation make sense.  Regardless of the reason for his injuries he was barely on the field for multiple seasons for us.

that's kind of the angle i've been looking at it all along. it doesn't matter how small or big you are, injuries can happen. it does make sense, though, that once CMC started bulking up that he started getting the injuries he did. 

what keuchly said, though, was right. guys like Brees and even CMC were able to either avoid being hit or handle being hit so that it had minimal effect on them. Young is like that. 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

Y’all act like you never see NFL QBs buying time moving around and out of the pocket. 

Also, wouldn’t you take Drew Brees at #1 if you could have?

With the staff we had at the time, his career would have been over before it began.

Brees didn't really become elite until he was paired with Sean Payton.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CPcavedweller said:

Because he's 5'10 and 185 lbs. The 204 was probably water weight and caloric intake unrelated to weight lifting. 

It blows my mind how many people give 0 F's about an NFL QB being the size of a JV HS football player. 

He has undeniable talent, but people are ignoring a HUGE red flag. Durability long term is a real concern. 

Hes not a small QB, he's tiny. He's smaller than most of the people typing on here. 

  • Pie 6
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SetfreexX said:

It blows my mind how many people give 0 F's about an NFL QB being the size of a JV HS football player. 

He has undeniable talent, but people are ignoring a HUGE red flag. Durability long term is a real concern. 

Hes not a small QB, he's tiny. He's smaller than most of the people typing on here. 

another post that should be pinned to the top

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, SetfreexX said:

Hes not a small QB, he's tiny. He's smaller than most of the people typing on here. 

https://www.google.com/search?q=average+size+american+male&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS867US867&oq=average+size+american+male&aqs=chrome.0.0i512j0i22i30l9.3375j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

And nearly 50% are obese. Talking about huddlers, that obsesity rate is probably even higher.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

Panthers are using Luke to "ease up concerns" about Bryce Young, its a wrap

 

Valid.

3 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

What was Luke's take on the rest of the class?

Also valid.

 

Would be interested in his take on Stroud. If he want on the air just to talk about Bryce, I agree with SPV; it's a lock we're going with Bryce and this the start of that uniting the fanbase effort that was alluded to earlier this week. No Panthers fan in their right mind is gonna question Luke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We've never seen them outside of the structure of two very well ran organizations I'll give you that. And yes they are long in the tooth. I do think they are more than capable of getting a franchise turned around in short term capacity though. They are by no means a long term solution.
    • You're not making a good-faith argument by blaming literally everything on the quarterback when the defense gave him a fat 38 seconds to overcome its ineptitude, but it seems you're dead-set on blaming him for any problem the team encounters. In this case, it's not warranted. Sometimes it is. But he had no time to throw (pressured on 46% of all dropbacks, an insane amount) and that's simply not all his fault -- particularly when they rush 4 or less and are in the backfield in 1.5s or less. Should we have gotten more than 0 yards? Sure! But he hit a WR in the hands on fourth down and it was dropped. Not his fault. He missed one throw on second down but I attribute first down to a bad play call and third down to poor pass protection. I would've called some quick slants, personally, but it really seems you're saying: - playcalling: Bryce's fault - poor pass protection: Bryce's fault - defensive choking away a lead: Bryce's fault, not the defense - Horn dropping a pass: Bryce's fault It's a great way to garner support on here, because when it comes to Bryce, logic takes such a backseat to context that it's not even in the same vehicle. Plenty of games can be attributed to him. Can't take anyone seriously who solely blames him for that one. 
    • I don't see how you can logically make that argument when the team beat two of the top teams in the entire league during the regular season.  Now imagine the additional games we would have won against absolute tip top competitors like SF and SEA had we had a professional QB.  You can throw any random stat at the problem you want, but the proof is in the pudding.  We all watched it live.  This roster would have produced 13 wins (wins against SF and SEA, two wins against NO, and would have swept the Bucs) and (almost certainly) a #1 seed with a remotely competent QB.  Those were not games where we needed an all star performance to win.  Those were games where a very, very modest stat line would have netted us an easy win. Nearly every measurable aspect of the team would have been significantly improved with a competent QB.
×
×
  • Create New...