Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official NFL 2023 Draft Discussion


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

And for comparison, even though people said the 2022 draft was bad for QBs, 9 were still taken.

Quote

There were nine QBs drafted in the 2022 NFL Draft. It marked the second-fewest of any draft in the past decade. Only the 2015 QB class saw fewer players selected than in 2022 (seven).

The 2022 NFL Draft was the first time that just one quarterback was drafted in the first round since EJ Manuel in 2013. It is just the second time in the past 20 years that the feat has occurred. The 20th pick is also the latest that the first QB has come off the board in those 20 years. Manuel at 16th in the 2013 NFL Draft was the only time since 2001 that a QB had not been taken inside the top 10.

Source

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dilla said:

He'll probably get drafted in the 7th for this very reason, but if he doesn't, Andrew Vorhees would be a great sign and stash guy. Day 2 talent that tore his ACL during the Combine so his rookie will be a shelf year.

Yeah he was someone I would have been okay with taking a flier on today. Should be a priority udfa if he doesn't hear his name called.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...