Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mocking Day 2 picks 32-39 with no trades


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

32. Pittsburgh:  Joey Porter, CB  Penn State:  Fills a need and makes too much sense.
33. Arizona:  Keion White, DE, Georgia Tech:  White fills the biggest need at any position in the NFL with a 4-3 DE pass rusher
34. Detroit: Michael Mayer, TE Notre Dame:  TE is a need, and Mayer is too good to pass up.
35. Indianapolis:  Brian Branch, CB/S Alabama:  Colts have need at both CB and S--Branch is both.  Could go OG here.
36. Los Angeles Rams:  Jalin Hyatt, WR, Tennessee: Stafford needs a WR and they are not deep in this draft  Mingo a possibility here as well.
37. Seattle: BJ Ojulari, OLB/Edge, LSU:  Seattle switched to a 3-4 base last year, and need an edge.  
38. Las Vegas: Will Levis, QB, Kentucky: They could go CB or G here, but Levis is a tremendous value and a long term need.  Raiders love players with a chip on their shoulders.
39. Carolina:  Trade back.  You have the top 2 Guards on the board (Torrence and Aliva), OLB/Edges Hall and Sanders, TE Washington, CBs Brents, Ringo, and Turner, and an OT I really like, Bergeron from Syracuse.  UNC WR Downs is sitting right there--waiting to drive down 85 to play for the Black and Blue.   That is 10 players, so I would move back to 48-50 if I could, then move up to about 60 to get a second day-2 player.  But that is just me--I live on the edge.

 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GOAT said:

have a feeling the Rams are going to shock everyone and take Levis to sit behind Stafford until he's ready.

Rams know Cohen his OC in 21 well, and it sounds like they are concerned about his long term health, it makes a lot of sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

trading back might just make the most sense. there's going to be a whole lot of solid talent available the rest of the day and anyone we get at 39 won't be much better than who we are capable of getting later on. just not enough separation between the talent. there's just a lot of good players out there to be had, imo.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

32. Pittsburgh:  Joey Porter, CB  Penn State:  Fills a need and makes too much sense.
33. Arizona:  Keion White, DE, Georgia Tech:  White fills the biggest need at any position in the NFL with a 4-3 DE pass rusher
34. Detroit: Michael Mayer, TE Notre Dame:  TE is a need, and Mayer is too good to pass up.
35. Indianapolis:  Brian Branch, CB/S Alabama:  Colts have need at both CB and S--Branch is both.  Could go OG here.
36. Los Angeles Rams:  Jalin Hyatt, WR, Tennessee: Stafford needs a WR and they are not deep in this draft  Mingo a possibility here as well.
37. Seattle: BJ Ojulari, OLB/Edge, LSU:  Seattle switched to a 3-4 base last year, and need an edge.  
38. Las Vegas: Will Levis, QB, Kentucky: They could go CB or G here, but Levis is a tremendous value and a long term need.  Raiders love players with a chip on their shoulders.
39. Carolina:  Trade back.  You have the top 2 Guards on the board (Torrence and Aliva), OLB/Edges Hall and Sanders, TE Washington, CBs Brents, Ringo, and Turner, and an OT I really like, Bergeron from Syracuse.  UNC WR Downs is sitting right there--waiting to drive down 85 to play for the Black and Blue.   That is 10 players, so I would move back to 48-50 if I could, then move up to about 60 to get a second day-2 player.  But that is just me--I live on the edge.

 

Might work if you do multiple trades. One problem is the Bucs and Saints probably have the best pick positions to swap with but the reality of that happening is slim. Seahawks you could get maybe 52 and 83 for 39

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, rayzor said:

trading back might just make the most sense. there's going to be a whole lot of solid talent available the rest of the day and anyone we get at 39 won't be much better than who we are capable of getting later on. just not enough separation between the talent. there's just a lot of good players out there to be had, imo.

After all the trade backs in 2021 we got a ton of nickels that honestly didn’t make our team any better. I’d rather just draft the guy at 39 who we think is the best player rather than get two guys later in the 2nd/3rd that are both less talented than the guy at 39. You have more chances to hit but more of a chance of getting a bunch of easily replaceable guys who don’t help you win. At some point we need more above average starters so we have a more talented team. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope when the pick rolls around to 39 the war room is jumping up and down because somebody, and I don’t care who or what position, is still on the board that they REALLY want. If they aren’t enthused by anyone, or is it “convicted”, then they entertain a trade back. Problem is who do they partner with in that case. Otherwise whoever they like best out of Torrence, Hall or Brents. Or I guess they could Minnesota it and just wait to turn the pick in.

Edited by mccjeff
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess I should have stipulated outside the sacred cow.   I complained from year one that Bryce should compete for and win the starting job on his own merit but no he was just handed it. I have been right there with everyone that wants competition.  But I don’t really have a huge problem with it for this season the way it has gone because where are the viable people we don’t have to trade for? I actually am okay with tiny hands Pickett because he is so close to Bryce arm strength wise and to be honest, skill wise. Probably. And it is only a one year deal.  That also takes I to account that the QB class is looking stacked next year and if Young fails miserably then we get either a reset or a real competition and there will be more guys that I would like looking at in the FA QB class next year as well.    I sort of accept where we are this year and look at it as a treading water year. I just want to get to next year with some clarity. More than anything. And they did empty out the room. Again, who was really there for us?  And I know it would not be a true competition at this point anyway. They are giving him the year, like it or not.    Also I don’t give a poo about winning games IF he sucks and or goes down after sucking because draft position and that stacked QB class.  And I want out from under him So Bad.     So I guess it is several factors that lessen my anxiety over his backup this particular season.    I am not trying to convince anyone, but you asked. 
    • What happened to King? Was he a no show?
    • think these smaller Qb's are going to have a much harder time convincing an NFL team to draft them. not saying a smaller Qb under 6 feet tall will not make an NFL roster .it will most likely be a UDFA contract more or less prove it deal.NFL teams have been burnt time & time again investing in these small NFL Qbs & i think  teams are now finally starting to realize that investing in these smaller Qb's under 6 feet tall is simply a bad idea  ...just saying 
×
×
  • Create New...