Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Projected Offense Starting Lineups for All 4 NFC South Teams

Pantha-kun

By Pantha-kun,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Pantha-kun Mentor

Pantha-kun

Posted
Posted (edited)

Thought this was pretty cool. Who has the best offense on paper here? Just includes QB and skill players, don't see O lines here. Also kinda wondering if Theilen and Chark really are the starting WRs... I feel like that could change up by week 1 and change even more through the season. Starting a 33 year old WR on the outside might be a bit sus to me. 

 

startersoffensenfcsouth.jpg

Edited by Pantha-kun
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ladypanther Grand Master

ladypanther

Posted
Posted

Kamara might not be available:

Kamara is scheduled to be back in court on July 31. [ for the trial on the assault charge]

Kamara is going to miss some time during training camp dealing with his legal issues.

And an NFL suspension will likely follow regardless of the outcome. The league has a precedent of sidelining players for about six games whether or not they have been found guilty; violent charges like this are still a violation of the league’s personal conduct policy. 

https://saintswire.usatoday.com/2023/03/02/alvin-kamara-not-guilty-court-trial-date-saints-training-camp-schedule/

With video evidence...not sure how he could get out of this.  That was awful.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RJK Grand Master

RJK

Posted
Posted

It really depends on miles sanders. If he’s a 1000 yard rusher then the panthers offense is probably the best in that group. If there are growing pains then NO offense will be the best in the division. Imo 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JawnyBlaze Grand Master

JawnyBlaze

Posted
Posted

Assuming everyone stays healthy and discounting Kamara’s potential missed games, it’s NO with us close behind. If you assume Michael Thomas doesn’t return to form, Chark breaks at some point, Kamara missed significant games, etc I’d say it’s us then NO close. TB and Atl have some weapons (a couple apiece, TB has a strong edge between the two) but the QBs will handicap them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ball4life Contributor

Ball4life

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I have no idea why Atlanta trade Ridley. Just a stupid move for them.

 

He's going to be a top 5 WR with Trevor Lawrence imo.

Ridley the guy that stopped playing for them after 5 games because of mental illness than got suspended the whole year the year after? 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...