Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Projected Offense Starting Lineups for All 4 NFC South Teams


Pantha-kun
 Share

Recommended Posts

Thought this was pretty cool. Who has the best offense on paper here? Just includes QB and skill players, don't see O lines here. Also kinda wondering if Theilen and Chark really are the starting WRs... I feel like that could change up by week 1 and change even more through the season. Starting a 33 year old WR on the outside might be a bit sus to me. 

 

startersoffensenfcsouth.jpg

Edited by Pantha-kun
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kamara might not be available:

Kamara is scheduled to be back in court on July 31. [ for the trial on the assault charge]

Kamara is going to miss some time during training camp dealing with his legal issues.

And an NFL suspension will likely follow regardless of the outcome. The league has a precedent of sidelining players for about six games whether or not they have been found guilty; violent charges like this are still a violation of the league’s personal conduct policy. 

https://saintswire.usatoday.com/2023/03/02/alvin-kamara-not-guilty-court-trial-date-saints-training-camp-schedule/

With video evidence...not sure how he could get out of this.  That was awful.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really depends on miles sanders. If he’s a 1000 yard rusher then the panthers offense is probably the best in that group. If there are growing pains then NO offense will be the best in the division. Imo 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming everyone stays healthy and discounting Kamara’s potential missed games, it’s NO with us close behind. If you assume Michael Thomas doesn’t return to form, Chark breaks at some point, Kamara missed significant games, etc I’d say it’s us then NO close. TB and Atl have some weapons (a couple apiece, TB has a strong edge between the two) but the QBs will handicap them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I have no idea why Atlanta trade Ridley. Just a stupid move for them.

 

He's going to be a top 5 WR with Trevor Lawrence imo.

Ridley the guy that stopped playing for them after 5 games because of mental illness than got suspended the whole year the year after? 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...