Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brian Burns New Number


 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Im straight.

 

It's obviously clear how handsome he is. There is nothing wrong with a man calling another man handsome.

 

It's 2023 not 2003.

I Dont Get It Over My Head GIF by Lil Jon
guys can’t even break balls anymore 🤦🏼‍♂️

Edited by RJK
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Topic is about a jersey# change.

 

You made it about a trade we declined and his bank account.

 

 

you made it about other things unrelated to his jersey# change as well...such as his bank account and him being your favorite player. so why try to single me out?

 

maybe you're the one who's mad. 

Edited by Manna
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I honestly don't like the new number policy. One of the things I preferred about the NFL vs. college was the jersey numbers by position group. It just made the game easier to follow IMO. It's not a big deal but I did prefer the old way.

same I feel like an old man. I wish Burns had gone 99 personally 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Players who change numbers have to buy out the inventory of their existing number.  Adrian Peterson was going to change his number from 28 to 23 as a Viking.  The bill was going to be astronomical, so he stayed 28.

In Burns statement he said "they are changing my position."  Players who change teams are able to change numbers without charge.  I am curious what position change Burns was referring to that allowed him to make his jersey change fre or cheap.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I want smoke with anybody when it comes to my favorite player.

 

If you hate Burns let it be known!

No real Panther fan hates Burns.

We just dont worship the ground he makes a beeline for the qb on.

Maybe when he stops to set the edge and earns his right to whiff on the QB he will receive more respect.  

Edited by PootieNunu
  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree it is more about the OL. If you happen to have a world beater with a great OL then that’s better obviously but you don’t need to have that.  Capable and durable guys that can get to the second level with good blocking can be plenty.  
    • I think Gibbs is special, but you’re right, some of the top investments have proven to not be much different than some 2nds and 3rds. Taylor for example is on an MVP level season. James Cook is doing better than Breece Hall for example. Raiders weren’t in a good spot to draft Jeanty. Same with the Falcons/Bijan.  You gotta swing at the right time — the investment shouldn’t come too early. You almost have to stumble into a guy mid to late rounds while building or find that guy to put you over the top when the team is finally well rounded.
    • Like I said in another post yesterday, the handling of the offensive line by Fitterer and mostly Morgan has been crazy. We've spent way too much money(Lewis and Hunt) to keep Bryce upright instead of using our picks in the 2nd round on JPJ and Frazier. Could have kept an injured Corbett at guard, Brady at swing, and still taken Maye as a backup, sorry Zavala. We wouldn't have taken XL, but XL hasn't been as advertised anyway, and Brooks hasn't contributed anything. Moton's extension with it's signing bonus made him uncutable. Icky's contract was due at the same time Bryce's 3rd year ended, and we all know it's extension or 5th year, and if we're going to do a 5th year, he's going to want the extension.  To me the whole thing is just ridiculous. Right now, depending on if Tepper decides to keep Bryce, it feels like we're going to have to choose between Icky and a Bryce extension. Maybe he plays on the 5th year, but I think he'll want the big money guarantee.  JMO, but if you took a look at how the contracts could potentially fall, the writing was on the wall that this could be a cash flow nightmare. Too many contract guarantees, not enough rookie contracts to offset the upcoming paydays. 
×
×
  • Create New...