Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we stop blaming Kasey

Panther53521

By Panther53521,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Ricky Prickles Grand Master

Ricky Prickles

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, Gerry Green said:

 

It's always been this way. Too many ppl think they are capable of out Trolling a Troll. Well, that and the fact that we have more than our fair share of Trolls to begin with.

You are a part timer troll yourself there bub. Kind of the pot calling the kettle black aint' it? But yeah, the guy in question I do believe is somewhat mentally challenged so I try to cut him a little slack and just gif meme him back for fun. We are all trolls to a degree, just some days some of us decide to act out a little more than others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jfra78 Grand Master

jfra78

Posted
Posted

He was too clutch his entire career to forgive him for that kick.  Great kickers don't kick the ball out of bounds in the Superbowl having just tied the game with less than a minute to go.  Vinitari would never had done it. Would we have won if he had kicked it out of the end zone? Who knows, but we probably go to overtime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
djp14 Rising Star

djp14

Posted
Posted

I don't obsess over that Super Bowl. If the NFL network shows it, I watch .... turning it off right after Proehl's touchdown.  We lost one of the greatest Super Bowls ever played. What can you do?

On the other hand, I have never re-watched one second of Super Bowl 50.  Too traumatic.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LordOfDaWingz Collaborator

LordOfDaWingz

Posted
Posted (edited)

John had never kicked a ball out of bounds and he chose THAT moment. I’ve moved past it but I will never forget that. It took the wind out of our sail. Maybe our defense wouldn’t have stopped Tom but he would’ve had to make a longer drive, felt like he basically got the ball at midfield. 
 

it was just frustrating bc the guys played their @$$es off just for the ball to be kicked out of bounds lol 

 

We had honestly grabbed momentum those last few possessions of the game. In my opinion. 

Edited by LordOfDaWingz
Link to comment
Share on other sites
weyco2000 Mentor

weyco2000

Posted
Posted
21 hours ago, Panther53521 said:

Yes the kickoff out of bounds was a mistake, but even if the Pats had to start inside the 20, they still had a good chance to get close enough for the FG.

the Stadium was warm that day, and you can tell by the way all scores where in late 1st half and 4 quarter.

our great defense didn’t sack Brady

Pats had the ball for 39 mins

We allowed 481 yards on defense

we started going to 2 points to early

our defense was extremely tired

we had a hell of a chance to win with all this going against us.

Please stop blaming Kasey, if not for him that year and his winning FG’s all year long, we would not even been in the Super Bowl 

Yes, should’ve kicked the extra points, but that’s not guaranteed points.

Love JK but that kick was awful, you could feel/see the momentum just turn on a dime. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OceanPanther Mentor

OceanPanther

Posted
Posted

I watched this game about 3 days ago  on NFL network.  I swear I thought we were going to win. 

Time of possession was what hurt us the most in this game.  39 min to 21 min. It didn't feel that way watching it live , because we were scoring. Our defense was zapped. Tired. 
Many of us agree,  we gave Brady too much time at the end.  

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...