Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Giants game


t96
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, App Panther said:

Corral had a wide open Shi Smith over middle for big gain and was fixated on Laviska who was double covered.

I'm not even sure he's backup material at this point. 

Amazing we wasted a 3rd and a 4th on him, a 5th on Mayfield and a 2nd, 4th and 6th on Darnold. SMH.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CRA said:

We got a green OC

We got a green DC

We got a HC that was fired for bad O he called 

and the board called them one of the best in the NFL simply because Matt Rhule was so bad. 

I hated the Reich hire from the get

go. I hoped I was wrong, but I really don’t see anything that tells me otherwise so far. This team is flat. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

again, come regular season if the first few games show the same as preseason, then I'll join the doom and gloom wagon.

i could care less about who wins in the preseason, chances are the coaches are just using it as an evaluation style scrimmage as they should.

i woese coaches will understand the deficiencies carolina beholds and likely will scheme and adjust for such.

i'd much rather see sloppiness and crap in the preseason, bc it's the perfect time to analyze weaknesses. if they gameplanned and actually tried scheming, well those weaknesses would be masked, and they wouldn't be able to adjust in time.

so yeah, i'm on the train of thought the coaches understand that and will scheme and adjust for it when games matter. if they don't, then i'll join the wtf wagon.

The problem is there evaluation is we suck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DamnItJake! said:

Bruh!! U guys got to realize it’s a whole new staff, scheme, rookies.. players who don’t fit the mold. And it’s damn Pre-Season!!!! We won’t know how this team really is til week 4-6 ..maybe 8-11!! This tea is young and new staff.. RELAX!!

Really don't care about record that much. I was really hoping we'd field a pro offense this season. Been a long time since we've had one.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...