Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Seahawks GameDay Thread!


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

You want to develop a QB that contributes to sustained success. Andy Dalton is mediocre and always has been. No point of putting him out there to win games that won’t add up to anything worth winning them. 

He wasn’t the problem today 

frankly, he was the  only  reasonthis pathetic assemblage of poor athletes and coaches were remotely watchable 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WhoKnows said:

Embarrassing. Seattle was down a ton of starters and this is what we get.

Dont forget that Seattle kicked 5 FGs. Thank goodness they didn’t convert more TDs.

TMJ is just not that guy and never was. 

We're also down starters... and lost like 4 more in the middle of the game, which is even worse.

Agree on TMJ... dude just has quit. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

You should go dig some of those threads up and I promise you they will look A LOT like this one. Football fans cannot look forward. They are so emotionally invested in what the current results are they whine and complain even if the future is bright. Doesn't matter.

I promise you they don't.

The team didn't even look this bad under Rhule, and we looked like complete poo.  We literally had 3 straight false start penalties on consecutive plays lol...  and iirc, then an illegal motion, then a sack on 4th down.  We have NEVER been this undisciplined on one side of the ball...  and this under an offensive HC.

There is no bright spot.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...