Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kyle Bailey says Tepper isnt happy, wants changes now.

CPF4LIFE

By CPF4LIFE,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I'm just hoping Tepper doesn't overreact to DJ going off tonight and makes a stupid trade next week because of it.

He needs to just realize that we're not a good team right now and we probably won't be for a few years.  Stop trading away future assets, trade players like Burns for picks and build up this team the right way.

Basically what we should have done instead of trading it all away to get Bryce.  Should have kept CMC, kept Moore, kept the rest of our picks and figured out QB another way, we'd be a much better team right now and in the future.

But we didn't do that and it can't be fixed with one move or even in one offseason, we just need to do it right.

Andy's probably our best qb since Cam and he's benched lol

 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tukafan21 Grand Master

tukafan21

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Andy's probably our best qb since Cam and he's benched lol

 

I still think Darnold was our best QB since Cam, but was submarined by horrible coaching.

That Shannahan was wiling to keep him around as his backup while shipping out Lance for peanuts, tells me he's better than he showed for us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BIGH2001 Grand Master

BIGH2001

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I still think Darnold was our best QB since Cam, but was submarined by horrible coaching.

That Shannahan was wiling to keep him around as his backup while shipping out Lance for peanuts, tells me he's better than he showed for us. 

Besides Robbie chosen aka chosen anderson what player hasn’t been better after leaving this dumpster fire?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrisbanePanther Mentor

BrisbanePanther

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Andy's probably our best qb since Cam and he's benched lol

 

Can I interest you in a history where a lot of Carolina fans on this very forum actually thought that Dalton was better than Cam at times? In fact, they looked at Dalton and compared him to Cam in the same fashion that Stroud and AR are being compared to Bryce. Better pure passer and all that.

Weird but true.

Edited by BrisbanePanther
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...