Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Antonio "Wilks" is why Frank has to be fired tomorrow


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

 

Even in their first loss today under Antonio Pierce, you can see how the Raiders were playing and had a chance until the very end. This was a 12.5 point underdog that could have very easily won this game. This is the same team that had no life/pulse under McDaniels.

 

Antonio Durran Pierce is a leader of men

Steve Wilks is a leader of men

 

Matt Rhule, Josh McDaniels, Frank Reich are Billionaire CONMEN 

 

usatsi-antonio-pierce-raiders.webp

1445022526.0.jpg

Edited by TheBigKat
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, thennek said:

I sometimes think one reason why this team is terrible is Perhaps the locker room was lost when Wilks was not retained. I get the impression he was very respected and the players played hard for him. 

That's not an impression, it's a fact. Just look at the players nobody is chewing each other out. Guys aren't showing emotion. Wilks had guys motivated to play for him. Frank is just here. I haven't seen a single player rave about him in the locker room.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

That's not an impression, it's a fact. Just look at the players nobody is chewing each other out. Guys aren't showing emotion. Wilks had guys motivated to play for him. Frank is just here. I haven't seen a single player rave about him in the locker room.

This team doesn't consist of Panthers. There are maybe 3 left. We just have a bunch of dudes wearing the same jersey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Stop with this Wilks BS. 9ers D isn't that elite. They're good and much better than us though. But stop acting like he's some top tier coach. Purdy won the game for the 9ers today. And btw, the players LOVED Rivera.

One thing I've heard is Wilks coaches from the booth and Ryans was on the sidelines. He was connected to his players constantly. It's rumored to have made quite the difference in how the defense has performed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, travisura said:

Just because Frank was the wrong decision, doesn't mean Wilks was the right one. 

I was ok with going in a different direction....................BUT NOT FOR FUGGIN FRANK REICH! If you were just going to hire a retread coach who literally just got fired midseason, you should have just rolled with the guy who got us back to competency.

It's the same as the Cam situation. I was fine moving on from him as the time had come.............BUT NOT FOR FUGGIN TEDDY BRIDGEWATER!!!!!! I'm starting to actually hate this franchise.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...