Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dave Tepper wants Ben Johnson


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Johnstonny said:

It will take 4yrs 70mil to get him here...plus one year to prove bryce aint it...and to unfk everything Fitt jacked up....

I don't care about Tepper's money when salary cap isn't involved. He just needs to hire people he trusts enough to leave them the fug alone and let them do their job. If that's Ben Johnson, fine. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't care about Tepper's money when salary cap isn't involved. He just needs to hire people he trusts enough to leave them the fug alone and let them do their job. If that's Ben Johnson, fine. 

...Yea...im speaking just on what it might take to get Ben Johnson  here...I think it will take more for someone to take on this train wreck. But dipper thought we were a drop in point guard away to competing from all the smoke fitt, (who he trusts), was blowing up his azz... is he going to be patient enough for a turn around or does his dumbazz think we are going to come close to competing next year?  Hes so far outta touch with whats going on its mind boggling... Jesus can't fix this in one year which is what Homer Simpson wants...but he can't buy.

Edited by Johnstonny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Castavar said:

Hmm, let's see.....

Option 1 - Go to Chargers with an already established franchise QB and weapons with very good players on defense.

Option 2 - Bet your coaching career with a potential bust of a QB, no weapons, no draft picks, and a meddling owner.

That sure is a hard one.

Mods close the thread and pin this response lol. Nothing left to be said. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Castavar said:

Hmm, let's see.....

Option 1 - Go to Chargers with an already established franchise QB and weapons with very good players on defense.

Option 2 - Bet your coaching career with a potential bust of a QB, no weapons, no draft picks, and a meddling owner.

That sure is a hard one.

I think the Chargers job is a bit overrated (still far better that ours though). They are $40M over the cap with an aging defense. They will have to cut some of their stars to make it work. The old GM left a lot to be desired. They do have a QB with a lot to offer, but one who hasn’t shown he can win when it counts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

FYI: Mile Kaye thinks it's remotely possible that Tepper tries to keep Fitterer by blaming everything on Reich.

Somehow that worked once with a lot of people blaming everything on Rhule and Fitterer getting a total pass.   It wont happen again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For everyone saying $, it’s already been the strategy and how has that worked so far?

newsflash - some coaches don’t want their career to die and actually want to go somewhere were they have a chance to win and don’t have to have weekly meetings with someone who has no clue about football nor do they want to have three way votes with his wife on what happens next lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Martin said:

I think the Chargers job is a bit overrated (still far better that ours though). They are $40M over the cap with an aging defense. They will have to cut some of their stars to make it work. The old GM left a lot to be desired. They do have a QB with a lot to offer, but one who hasn’t shown he can win when it counts. 

I agree, it's fools gold.  It's a better landing spot for someone with experience (at both positions) because they can rebound faster than having the growing pains and dealing with those type of things out of the gate. Chicago IF it comes open would be the better landing spot, great cap space, great GM, great picks. Yet, I feel like Chicago would try to lure Harbaugh.. this coaching cycle is gonna be interesting to say the least.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Johnson is the dream.

Harbaugh is the vet culture changer that can fix Bryce.

Neither are coming here. 

Belichick would not come to this much of a project at his age and history. I see him in LA or somewhere with more pieces to the puzzle in place.

Panthers fans need to be comfortable with either Evero, Slowik, Smith or O'Brien. Truthfully, Evero is going to make the most sense and deserves his shot. Learn from the Wilks mistake. 

I also think Flores could be a darkhorse, but I doubt he wants to go another round with an undersized 'Bama rookie QB. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Soul Rebel said:

Johnson is the dream.

Harbaugh is the vet culture changer that can fix Bryce.

Neither are coming here. 

Belichick would not come to this much of a project at his age and history. I see him in LA or somewhere with more pieces to the puzzle in place.

Panthers fans need to be comfortable with either Evero, Slowik, Smith or O'Brien. Truthfully, Evero is going to make the most sense and deserves his shot. Learn from the Wilks mistake. 

I also think Flores could be a darkhorse, but I doubt he wants to go another round with an undersized 'Bama rookie QB. 

What's funny is, that list we 'have to be comfortable with' would still be a great hire... sans Bill O'B and maybe Frank Smith.. don't know a ton about him tbh. If Johnson is the dream, I'd have to wager that Slowik is right up there. Did great with a rookie, granted better situation week to week.  Either way has him in MVP conversations and maybe 2nd in the league in passing... Lowkey I like Slowik, pairing him with a FO member from SF as GM. Evero is my close second though.  If we can't get a young OC hire Evero.

Neither Harbaugh nor Bill B are even confirmed to be in this pool of candidates to this point.  Mentioning them is a futile at this point.. I can circle back to them if and when they are confirmed to have NFL interest or interest to continue coaching. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Castavar said:

Hmm, let's see.....

Option 1 - Go to Chargers with an already established franchise QB and weapons with very good players on defense.

Option 2 - Bet your coaching career with a potential bust of a QB, no weapons, no draft picks, and a meddling owner.

That sure is a hard one.

Yeah, until one peeps the Chargers cap situation.  

Yikes. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...