Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some coaches want out. But the Clown in the high castle (Tepper) says nope


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Jesse said:

On one hand I understand where they're coming from. On the other hand, they signed the contract.

Double edged sword though. If you refuse to let someone move on then it will be harder to find good people to come here. Generally if someone wants to move it is better to let them unless you want another Fox lame duck year. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jesse said:

On one hand I understand where they're coming from. On the other hand, they signed the contract.

Similar as with players, NFL contracts basically engender loyalty...but only on one side.

Tepper is not allowing guys to interview elsewhere quite possibly in hopes that the new head coach will keep them, but if he doesn't then we screwed those guys out of an opportunity to get a job elsewhere. Dick move...

I'd add that if I were making a guess, I'd say she's likely talking about Evero.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ornias said:

Double edged sword though. If you refuse to let someone move on then it will be harder to find good people to come here. Generally if someone wants to move it is better to let them unless you want another Fox lame duck year. 

Yep.

Lots of teams in transition allow guys to seek employment elsewhere just out of courtesy because they realize the new coach will want their own staff.

We're trying to interfere, even despite the problems that caused last time.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are under contract. They can sit and see if the new coach/GM would like to keep them. Just like players, they can be viewed as assets. Especially the minority coaches, who if they are under contract for 2 years and take a promotion net us draft capital. 

If a team wants one of our coordinators, they can trade us for them. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

no sense in freeing them up until we know what direction we are going to go. sucks for the coaches, but that's part of the deal with the contract they signed. there's no obligation to let them go. of course it's not going to make anyone want to stay around. if they already wanted to check out of this dumpster fire, this will only want them to bail out more. 

there' s really no winning with this for anyone. but this is what kind of thing can happen when you work for a crap organization.

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...