Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Looks like we get to keep Ejiro Evero!


Loyalty4Life
 Share

Recommended Posts

And then there was one.  With the Baltimore DC, Mike McDonald becomeing the HC of the Seahawks that only leaves the Commanders.  Ejiro Evero is not interview at all with the Commanders.  A lot of rumors saying Quinn and Vrabel is still out there.  Unless something drastic happens we get to keep the part of the Panthers that looked pretty good last year.

I really like Evero a lot.  Very professional.  Seems to raise above all the drama last year on offense.  I also really liked the way we played down the stretch and how tough and physical they were.  Also, note that we had a ton of injuries all over the defense were never at full strength for almost the entire year.

While I would not have had too big a problem if we wanted to fire everyone I think it'll be a great help to first year HC Canales that he pretty much doesn't have to do very much in regards to the defense.  He can focus on retooling the dumpster fire of an offense.

Evero is stability and that is something every other unit can lean on.  I expect in his second year Evero will be even better.

Due to the rules of hiring minority coaches.  If Evero coaches 2 years and leaves for a HC job, we get 2, 3rd round draft pics as compensation.  That is another huge plus.

Already starting to get a little hyped about next year.

Keep pounding.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, MtnJax said:

That’s if Evero wants to stay. He might want out of that contract to go elsewhere

Well too fugging bad. If he’s this great professional and man with HC written all over him like everybody keeps saying, then he’ll man up and do his job to the best of his ability so that he can get a HC job next cycle.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, MtnJax said:

That’s if Evero wants to stay. He might want out of that contract to go elsewhere

He does want out but can’t leave if it’s a lateral move. Tepper is holding him hostage. He’s getting paid well but doesn’t want to be here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Newbie said:

He does want out but can’t leave if it’s a lateral move. Tepper is holding him hostage. He’s getting paid well but doesn’t want to be here. 

Adhering to your signed contract is not “holding him hostage”. He can wipe his tears with his $6M of $100 bills 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Don't forget the young TEs, Coker, Etienne, and Jimmy Horn Jr! 😮 I'm amped to see how the team develops over the course of this upcoming season.
    • She must be doing tricks on that thang for Bill 
    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
×
×
  • Create New...