Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Officially Entering My Vote for WR Keon Coleman


chknwing
 Share

Recommended Posts

And I absolutely hate the idea of getting some big TE ish WR specifically because of Bryce Young issues.  A QB that will have to defy all sorts of odds to be the guy.  

we added a TE in FA last year….and he had his worst year in his last half decade in the league.  

I want a quick/fast WR and a rec RB in this draft class.    Both should be easy to get if we want them. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CRA said:

And I absolutely hate the idea of getting some big TE ish WR specifically because of Bryce Young issues.  A QB that will have to defy all sorts of odds to be the guy.  

we added a TE in FA last year….and he had his worst year in his last half decade in the league.  

I want a quick/fast WR and a rec RB in this draft class.    Both should be easy to get if we want them. 

I think thats a silly argument anyways.  Tua is barely 6' and both his wr are 5'10 and they have no problem putting up passing numbers.  Its as silly as the old Cam has to have tall receivers so he doesnt over throw them junk.  These big receivers who dont get seperation but can sometimes make contested catches are old school.  Thats not what modern offenses use anymore.   Thats what tight ends are for.  Almost all the best passing offense utilize mostly receivers between 5'8 and 6'1 I would guess without really digging in to it.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tr3ach said:

I think thats a silly argument anyways.  Tua is barely 6' and both his wr are 5'10 and they have no problem putting up passing numbers.  Its as silly as the old Cam has to have tall receivers so he doesnt over throw them junk.  These big receivers who dont get seperation but can sometimes make contested catches are old school.  Thats not what modern offenses use anymore.   Thats what tight ends are for.  Almost all the best passing offense utilize mostly receivers between 5'8 and 6'1 I would guess without really digging in to it.  

And Cam ended up going to the Super Bowl with what….the additions of speed.  Ginn and Philly.  As irrelevant as people thought Philly was, Cam spoke about even a meh speed guy going down in the Super Bowl was brutal. 

TE play was provided by the TE. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

40 time is distinctively different from the ability to separate. The tape will tell the story on that. 

I don’t love him as a prospect, TBH.

Also, our history with FSU players is pretty bad. As I said in another thread, I am just fine never taking another FSU player again.

After the all "Ohio State quarterbacks suck" thing I'm out on these generalities. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, chknwing said:

yeah but he had the fastest time in the guantlet.  catching balls.  which is what matters.  how fast someone runs in tights, doesnt matter in the NFL.

The gauntlet drill is run in tights.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, chknwing said:

This guy will give Bryce a big target to throw to and many yards after the catch with his freakish size/strength, he will shrug off tacklers.  One arm catch is normal for him.  If hes there at 33, he better be a panther.

 

Wont be there at 33

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I knew 4.6 is bad,but Keon Coleman is faster than Puka Nacua in gauntlet,and look how bad Puka Nacua'RAS is.

513684794_KeonColeman.thumb.jpg.c2993de11e1384d2b3c357a518f3bdbd.jpg

Keon Coleman is a steal if he droped to #33,he will shine in some simple routes like slant or flat,maybe he will be anther "Slant Boy".

BUT...separation guy is a prior need,like Roman Wilson,Ricky Pearsall...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he did a lot more for FSU than people give him credit for but I just don’t view him as a fit.

We need quick, technician do it alls I.E McConkey, Mitchell

Shifty slot types with eventual outside potential like Pearsall, Washington, Corley

Or the guys with big play, high ceiling potential like Franklin, McMillan, heck even J Jackson, Thrash or Baker a bit later.

The two I’m just not feeling are Coleman and Legette. They just don’t check the “feel” barometer for me and don’t align with what we need.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 600 I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...