Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024, what we could see...

musicman

By musicman,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, CRA said:

I think if we had our #1 overall pick, the Bryce Young experiment would have basically been Clausen 2.0 and we moved on taking one of these dudes.  And that's all he got.  Stays on the roster and probably had a better shot at re-emerging than Clausen did though.    

Pretty much unless the defense was shitting the bed or something. As of right now we would be looking at Sanders pretty hard…

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

I am fine with whatever the win total. If it is 5 or 6 that is twice this year's total and it means Bryce played much better. Let's keep pounding.  If it is only 2 then we have a really high draft pick and we swing again for the right QB draft pick to be our next Cam Newton. Consolation for the suffering. I won't venture we would win more than 6 games so there you go. Good news no matter what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

Here is what scares me: 

We have to hit on 2 starters, 3 contributing players in this draft with 2nd 3rd and 4th rounders.  A WR, maybe 2 has to hit the jackpot.  In the history of the Panthers since Smith, name a wr we have drafted that was really good-Moore?  any others?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tbe Grand Master

Tbe

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, Donald LaFell said:

Without getting into the sunk cost fallacy, the team invested too much in Bryce to not make this season all about him. 
 

Give him the best chance to succeed so we can move forward. If he blows then we are in a better spot for a new QB or vet to take over. 


Bro, giving him the best chance to succeed means 2-3 new/good linemen and a completely different WR corps.

Thats not happening.

He might get two of each, but they’ll be rookies or jags.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tbe Grand Master

Tbe

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Here is what scares me: 

We have to hit on 2 starters, 3 contributing players in this draft with 2nd 3rd and 4th rounders.  A WR, maybe 2 has to hit the jackpot.  In the history of the Panthers since Smith, name a wr we have drafted that was really good-Moore?  any others?

History says we get one starter from this group.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SetfreexX Mentor

SetfreexX

Posted
Posted
On 3/6/2024 at 10:03 AM, Jon Snow said:

Lol. This team is not winning 6 or more games. They will be lucky to win 3 games.

I'd say this is a little pessimistic, coaching failed us in at least 1-3 games this past season. Five games won is a possibility, ''lucky to win three'', I'm not going that far. 

6-6 with Darnold / Walker, McAdoo, and journeyman HB's with just one WR in Moore won't allow me to COMPLETELY sell on a functional offense in 24'. 

The OL in my opinion regressed because Frank came in and tried the ''my offense'' approach versus building on what we actually did well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Leaky_Faucet Community Regular

Leaky_Faucet

Posted
Posted

What will you see? Tons of holes in the roster. Guys you thought you really liked getting benched, and those you never heard of until preseason getting reps. A lot of close games that they end up losing.  People you wouldn't expect to become leaders leading, and those that are supposed to be leaders letting you down. The fanbase at odds with one another on whose fault it is, the new coach or they players that they have been told are good. 

It's growing year, buckle up. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Leaky_Faucet said:

What will you see? Tons of holes in the roster. Guys you thought you really liked getting benched, and those you never heard of until preseason getting reps. A lot of close games that they end up losing.  People you wouldn't expect to become leaders leading, and those that are supposed to be leaders letting you down. The fanbase at odds with one another on whose fault it is, the new coach or they players that they have been told are good. 

It's growing year, buckle up. 

Most of us know whos at fault- david tepper. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • WUnderhill
      Legette for Coleman?

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      That is a big HELL NO. As bad as XL was this season, at least he adds a dimension that the coaches can use for specific plays. Coleman is just as bad, yet adds zero diversity to our receiving corps. I’ll take the guy that at least cares enough to show up to meetings. Getting traded to a new team won’t change either of their work ethics.
    • kungfoodude
      I’m just not impressed with these hires/openings

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I don't think there is any real reason to amend the rule. If you do, the teams will just find a way to abuse it. All the Browns have to do is just interview SOMEONE to "get through" the process. Hell, interview Jim Caldwell if that's what the actual goal is, just to get around it.  Also, they have all of the candidates required for the Rooney Rule in Aden Durde and Nate Scheelhaase. They are in full compliance already. Scheelhaase is already scheduled for a second interview, for that matter.
    • Khyber53
      Don't be greedy.

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      I don't know about the stans but he's at times been like 60 percent of the offense on a playoff calibre team. He put up 1202 rushing yards and 10 touchdowns, then had effing 102 receptions for 924 yards and seven receiving touchdowns. He touched the ball 413 times this season (an average of 24 times per game.) Then you have to add in that he's a hell of a blocker when called upon. Without him, the injury depleted 49ers in a hot NFCWest division don't make the playoffs at all.  If that isn't the Most Valuable Player on the team then who should be? The idea that it is an award solely for QBs is just narrow. Edit to add: Will he win it? No. 
×
×
  • Create New...