Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bill's Diggs to Houston for 2025 2nd rounder


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, RJK said:

Diggs is a good player but also a pain in the ass. The panthers aren’t in a place as a franchise to take on that kind of player. Ultimately he’d have been detrimental to the rebuild 

I do agree that Diggs' age and contract is probably not where this team wants to be right now. 

But I will say that the FO just had a complete rehaul minus the DC and his core. We don't know what type of leader Canales (and to a lesser degree Morgan) will be yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Navy_football said:

This is what they should be doing when you have a stud QB on a rookie deal. Cap numbers will change alot in 4 years. Alot lot!

Might have another qb on a new rookie deal next year. Ya never know.

  • The D 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys ‘member when the Raiders traded only like a 3rd round pick or something for Antonio Brown? Or the Cardinals trading for DeAndre Hopkins and only getting like one good season out of him? I don’t think trading for disgruntled WRs has quite the positive track record some seem to believe it does.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RJK said:

Diggs is a good player but also a pain in the ass. The panthers aren’t in a place as a franchise to take on that kind of player. Ultimately he’d have been detrimental to the rebuild 

Yea...a Cotchery with a tood....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Texans are living proof why you go all in. This is going to be Burrow 2.0 with the weapons they put around him.

 

The Texans didn't really need another WR, but now that offense is absolutely loaded. Good luck stopping them.

 

I expect Chiefs vs Texans for the AFC championship.

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WUnderhill said:

You guys ‘member when the Raiders traded only like a 3rd round pick or something for Antonio Brown? Or the Cardinals trading for DeAndre Hopkins and only getting like one good season out of him? I don’t think trading for disgruntled WRs has quite the positive track record some seem to believe it does.

The DHop trade from the Texans was highway robbery. Lack of production on his part was not because of a lack of skills on his part. If we could get Tee Higgins for a 4th and Sanders I'd take that deal all day long and twice on Sunday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

The DHop trade from the Texans was highway robbery. Lack of production on his part was not because of a lack of skills on his part. If we could get Tee Higgins for a 4th and Sanders I'd take that deal all day long and twice on Sunday. 

Pretty sure the Cardinals traded a second. The point was that the Cardinals were certainly hoping for more than one full year of production, regardless of the reasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Purpose This study investigates the interplay between strategic goals and calculative practices, specifically Customer Profitability Analysis (CPA). Drawing on practice-based theories, the research aims to understand how managers strategize with CPA, including the balancing of financial and strategic objectives and the interplay of institutionalized practices with individual practitioners’ actions. Design The study uses a qualitative, revelatory, and exploratory case study approach at the sub-organizational level in a manufacturing company. The researchers compare CPA practices across six departments, guided by a phenomenological research design. Data collection methods include informal conversations, qualitative observations, written documentation, numerical evidence from the accounting system, and interviews. Findings The study offers four novel findings to the field. First, it highlights how managers employ procedural and interactive strategizing to reframe CPA practices. The sophistication of CPA practices increases with unevenly distributed customer volume, high customer-specific, controllable overhead, customer-to-customer interaction, and service complexity. Conversely, the sophistication of cost-focused CPA practices tends to decrease with diverse strategic goals. Additionally, CPA become more effective through the utilization of non-financial information, employee empowerment, localization, and strategic alignment. Second, CPA can be adapted through integrative strategizing where managers avoid using it as a financial benchmark for strategic initiatives. Third, accountants actively seek intermediary roles to incorporate arguments from strategy and marketing to balance strategic objectives–contrary to their portrayal as myopic guardians of profitability. Fourth, the localization of CPA practices to front-line employees compensates for a lack of sophisticated CPA practices. Future research Future research should, investigate the adaptation of calculative practices in different cultures, and industries. Exploring additional contextual factors such as uncertainty, management characteristics, and linguistic framing of practices would be beneficial. Examining the interactions in utilizing CPA practices between front-line staff and customers would shed light on their effectiveness. Lastly, investigating the role of consultants in diffusing such practices would offer valuable perspectives.
    • Management accounting for strategic decision making takes center stage in the business world. Dive into the intricate realm of financial data analysis and its pivotal role in shaping organizational strategies for success. Learn how key performance indicators, budgeting, and cost-volume-profit analysis drive informed decision-making, leading to sustainable growth and competitive advantage. Overview of Management Accounting for Strategic Decision Making Management accounting plays a crucial role in helping organizations make strategic decisions by providing valuable financial information and analysis. It involves the process of identifying, measuring, analyzing, interpreting, and communicating financial information to support management in making informed decisions. Importance of Management Accounting in Guiding Strategic Decisions, Management accounting for strategic decision making Management accounting is essential for guiding strategic decisions as it provides insights into the financial health of the organization, helps in assessing performance, and aids in forecasting future outcomes. By utilizing management accounting techniques, organizations can effectively allocate resources, identify areas for improvement, and evaluate the impact of strategic decisions on profitability and growth. Cost analysis: Management accounting helps in analyzing the cost structure of the organization, identifying cost drivers, and determining the profitability of products or services. This information is crucial for making pricing decisions and optimizing the use of resources. Budgeting and forecasting: Through budgeting and forecasting, management accountants can help organizations set realistic financial goals, monitor performance against targets, and adjust strategies as needed to achieve desired outcomes. Performance measurement: Management accounting enables organizations to track key performance indicators (KPIs), measure performance against benchmarks, and evaluate the effectiveness of strategies in achieving organizational objectives. Examples of How Management Accounting Influences Strategic Planning Management accounting influences strategic planning in various ways, such as: Scenario analysis: Management accountants can create different scenarios based on varying assumptions to help organizations evaluate the potential outcomes of different strategic decisions and choose the most favorable course of action. Capital budgeting: Management accounting techniques like net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) are used to evaluate investment opportunities, assess their long-term financial impact, and prioritize projects that align with strategic goals. Variance analysis: By comparing actual performance against budgeted or expected results, management accountants can identify areas of concern, investigate deviations, and recommend corrective actions to ensure strategic objectives are met.
×
×
  • Create New...