Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

[NFL] Hard Knocks: A Snippet from Brian Burns trade talks starting at the Senior Bowl


Saca312
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

This is literally, "So, I would like some pussy." 

Ends up, "I'll suck anyone's dick."

That's the negotiating tactic I see.

It's all about those Dawgs has a broader meaning I guess...

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me it felt sarcastic when he said two firsts. He knew there was no chance, especially with the contract Burns would command. But obviously we should have sent on if the huddles many master negotiators, that would have guaranteed 10-15 first rounders.

  • Pie 7
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Martin said:

To me it felt sarcastic when he said two firsts. He knew there was no chance, especially with the contract Burns would command. But obviously we should have sent on if the huddles many master negotiators, that would have guaranteed 10-15 first rounders.

Yeah, you can tell the two first thing was a play on the rams offer. This was “shooting the poo” as people say.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Burns playing like a bum all last season  tanked his trade value and contract. If he shows out and plays like an animal all season, we get at least a first and he might have gotten the money he wanted.

Instead, he showed the league he’s all about the business decision. Sounds like a GM killer to me. Morgan would have taken a Burger King Italian chicken sandwich (bring it back, BK) to get him gone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Gapanthersfan said:

Burns playing like a bum all last season  tanked his trade value and contract. If he shows out and plays like an animal all season, we get at least a first and he might have gotten the money he wanted.

Instead, he showed the league he’s all about the business decision. Sounds like a GM killer to me. Morgan would have taken a Burger King Italian chicken sandwich (bring it back, BK) to get him gone. 

Yeah as already stated in this thread and numerous other times, turning down the rams offer killed any chance of getting a haul for him now

Not going to fault Morgan, at least this time around, glad Burns is gone and we were able to flip that money over into the OL

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Wow actually watching this. They didn't pay Saquon because they invested in Daniel Jones and want to see him sling it lol. 

Jones showed 10x what Bryce showed in their respective rookie seasons. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Jones showed 10x what Bryce showed in their respective rookie seasons. 

Jones didn’t have the crapshow of a team that Bryce had as a rookie either.

Nothing personal, but can we please move on from the Bryce-bashing and look ahead to next season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Prowler2k18 said:

Jones didn’t have the crapshow of a team that Bryce had as a rookie either.

Nothing personal, but can we please move on from the Bryce-bashing and look ahead to next season?

No because what was stated was true. Many rookie QBs have had a rough rookie year but also showed something. Bryce did not and it wasn't all the crap show around him, he was a substantial part of that crap show. His best game as the GB game and the other team looked like they had their heads up their butts more than the Panthers were good IMO. 

Don't like it? I sympathize but no one has to play pretend if they don't want to. That wasn't Bryce bashing it was just truth that hurts. There is a big difference. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I like Jaycee a lot and appreciate his leadership but to say he's above Ramsey right now is based on hopium let's be realistic. He's got a great deal to prove this season. I’m hoping to see that he firmly establishes himself amongst his peers.
    • It’s amazing how simple it is. When you are winning 2-7 games for 7 straight years, you’d think people would understand that just drafting some starters isn’t poo unless they are above average NFL starters. Justin Jefferson and Jamar Chase started their rookie years like Legette did so we got an elite WR in the 2024 draft. Luke was a rookie starter just like Wallace. Damn we basically got a Kuechly and Jefferson last year. Bravo Dan Morgan!!!
    • I didn’t even say they would be starters. I don’t think Legette will be and Coker was not drafted. Coker chose to sign with us because our WR room gave him a chance to start even though we drafted a guy in the 1st. That should tell you something when Coker chose to come to Carolina even after we took Legette. We drafted and signed guys to potentially replace Sanders, who isn’t a starter yet over Tremble) and Wallace. Go look at our other drafts since Rhule. We had tons of rookie contribution from all of our recent classes. Why, because our overall talent sucked and we needed bodies. Go look at PFR. Here’s some of our players who “started” for a year: TMJ, Mingo, BC, Ian Thomas, Jermaine Carter, Dennis Daley, YGM and Roy. That’s what Legette and Wallace are right now although unless TMac bombs, Legette has kind of already lost his spot. We’ve had shitty drafts since 2018 and every single one has contributed at least two guys who’ve started so 2024 is tied for last right now and we just had a draft where we took 3 more players who play the same position as 3 of our top 4 picks in 2024 but somehow I’m saying that the 2024 draft class is good? Nope, the 2024 draft class was bad and our team is still in the low enough talent quadrant that lots of rookie contribute in our holes until we replace them. Been the same story since 2018 and accelerated as the old solid vets retired/move on.
×
×
  • Create New...