Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How many games are you willing to give Young?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, strato said:

It shouldn’t take all season to figure this out.

 

I give it 3 games to know how they internally feel. How the act on it is another story. Doesn't really matter how long people on here are willing to give him, if the fans in the stadium start booing they might gotta do something sooner than later

Edited by Jackie Lee
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone willing to give him any more games should be willing to give any random cheeks QB a season+ to prove something.  The only reason he’s getting another chance is sunk cost.  Any other QB with less invested that played like BY9 last year would be a dead man walking NFL wise.

I have zero faith and every game played with him at starter is a wasted week.

Edited by Newtcase
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

I give it 3 games to know how they internally feel. How the act on it is another story. Doesn't really matter how long people on here are willing to give him, if the fans in the stadium start booing they might gotta do something sooner than later

I think that's what's it's gonna take. If plays like last year and continues to blindly support it will be no pressure by the team. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Panic said:

WTF is wrong with this fan base. Support your young QB. Ride or die this season. Enjoy your new and energetic coach. And stop with all this negative BS.

That's's cute.

With respect to OP's question, if Tepper is rational then he gets the entire season. The wild card is if he continues to suck, can Tepper handle it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems that they want him to become what Dalton already is. They would be .500+ with Dalton. A game manager with a good arm with these WRs and oline would be fun to watch. Trading assets for a 5-8 165 lb qb who you have to pull in hail Mary situation is idiotic. Hope I'm wrong I'm rooting hard for bryce to succeed 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, strato said:

It shouldn’t take all season to figure this out.

 

it took about 17 minutes of gametime for the falcons to figure him out and make it very clear this was never going to work.

loved the morons here claiming it was the wide receivers fault bryce was throwing go out routes of bounds, or practically handing the ball off to jessie bates.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Newtcase said:

Anyone willing to give him any more games should be willing to give any random cheeks QB a season+ to prove something.  The only reason he’s getting another chance is sunk cost.  Any other QB with less invested that played like BY9 last year would be a dead man walking NFL wise.

I have zero faith and every game played with him at starter is a wasted week.

And anyone playing him into another #1 pick shouldn't be around to make that pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...