Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who are You Drafting with the #1 Pick of 2025???


Hoenheim
 Share

Who you drafting?   

101 members have voted

  1. 1. What Player?

    • Quinn Ewers (QB Texas)
      44
    • Sheddur Sanders (QB Colorado)
      10
    • Carson Beck (QB Gerogia)
      18
    • Luther Burden III (WR Missouri)
      1
    • James Pearce (DE Tennessee)
      6
    • Travis Hunter (CB/WR Colorado)
      8
    • Another QB
      11
    • Another DE
      2
    • Another CB
      0
    • Another WR
      0


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Panthercougar68 said:

The generational guy from 2024 passed for 93 yards today 

my point being if the player is the right player take him don’t wory about the media.

Our roster sucks.

 

Taking a QB just because we need to replace Bryce would be a bad decision especially if this class doesn't have that elite QB.

It's literally a toss up who the best QB in this class is. Beck looks good, but that roster is loaded. How would he look in Carolina with nothing around him?

 

Same for all the other QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) Ewers

2a) Beck

2b) Ward

Yall sleeping on Ward. Looked good year 2 at both Washington state and Incarnate world before that. the knock is age there imo (5th year right now). the others 2 are younger. Ward is more ready than Beck. really fun to watch. idk where the idea miami doesnt have talent came from earlier in this thread. imo, ward is going to show the talent they always snag there in south beach. he already opening eyes, but its 2 easy games so far (well this 2024 florida team isnt the one of old)

I wanted Ewers last year after 2 good ones at texas, want him as #1 this year. not the big strong guy like beck. IDC, Ewers delivers. little bit loose with the ball sometimes. but dude has an NFL arm. he understands the concepts well and isnt waiting to throw to the open guy, he understands how things are developing in front of him and throws before the guy gets open. hes my guy like stroud before. Hes been ready like stroud but decided to run it back another year. yeah he has talent, but even with the crazy turnover, he still delivers (like stroud). 

someone said Beck is Goff.  looks like Tarzan plays like Jane. if you give him time he may be a guy that makes a 2nd team a real find. need a really good coach to unlock him and help him early on but cant teach the size and arm on that kid. only reason. i think ward is the safer bet, but if beck hits, hes a top 10 guy or better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Number one overall? It would figure to be a year nothing anyone wants to trade up for, would be the year we have it. 
 

Who best fits Canales is what I would say, and I got no idea about the many individual QBs at this point. 
 

It will be a little bit before I would say specifically what we need the most otherwise but if there is an all world DE I’d say we could use one. Trade back to him. Sign a QB that Canales likes. Draft one he likes too. I don’t care who, it is a guaranteed upgrade. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...