Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Start Bryce from here on out….

TheBigKat

By TheBigKat,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

La Pantera Experienced

La Pantera

Posted
Posted

In reality it will have to happen at some point. Assuming we keep losing, we’ll need to see if Young can turn it around and be the guy. Or Do we need to move on and draft another QB.

most fans (myself included) have already formed their opinions. But has the staff came to the same conclusion??

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Agreed. This is why I am still on the Morgan bandwagon. Though each pick may not have been the best player available I believe each player has a huge upside. 

As XL gets more reps he is going to get better and better.  That catch in the endzone was top level. 

Brooks was clearly picked for the future and not 2024.

Wallace has been thrust into full time duties and though he has made mistakes I think he was a great 3rd pick and will be a mainstay in the coming years. 

And as you pointed out Sanders was supposed to get spot duties and sit back and learn. He wasn't expected to be our #1 option at TE.  If it were up to me I. Thomas would never see the field again and just let Sanders learn by experience. 

Coker a UDFA, he may turn into AT replacement in the slot. He's got great hands and can get open. 

While 2024 season is so painful to watch I think slowly but surely we are heading in the right direction. 

2025 off season we address the defense. 

The "upside" is why I am down on Morgan. That was Fitterer 101. Upside, upside and more upside with a healthy helping of raw and undeveloped.

Early returns from this class are a little mixed(2nd round pick is turning out very badly) but it's going to be 2025 and onward to know if he knows what he is doing or is Fit 2.0.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

i'm not interested in seeing that happen ever again.

i'm not committed to losing. i'm tired of that. i want to see this team continue to fight. they won't fight with bryce. they'll quit and i don't want that to happen.

screw the early pick. i want this team to fight till the end.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

i'd rather have a team that fights, gives it everything it's got, and still loses rather than a team that uses losing as a strategy. 

fighting while losing is still helping to create a winning mentality and culture. 

a team committed to losing creates a losing culture. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NAS Grand Master

NAS

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, rayzor said:

i'm not interested in seeing that happen ever again.

i'm not committed to losing. i'm tired of that. i want to see this team continue to fight. they won't fight with bryce. they'll quit and i don't want that to happen.

screw the early pick. i want this team to fight till the end.

Agreed, AND you can’t possibly evaluate the rest of your offensive players with Bryce stinking it up.  With Andy we at least should be competitive and gives us something to get excited about in the future. Bryce is done and Canales has all but said that

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NorthTryon Mentor

NorthTryon

Posted
Posted

I just don't understand the love and affinity for this player. All online today were stupid Bryce apologists comments. These are two that I especially thought were egregious. That's my problem with Tepper. He has been so inept as an owner, people are really acting like it took an organization to ruin the shortest first round QB in the history of the draft with a weak arm, and a soft demeanor. Bryce was never going to be a good NFL QB and only Tepper couldn't see it. Bryce would be garbage truck juice in Houston, Tennessee, and Indianapolis. 

If Bryce would've been in there we'd at least got a field goal.

How's that change to Andy Dalton treating ya?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...