Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official is it GameDay thread?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Hoenheim said:

Every single passes is at or behind the LOS

Washington is taking away deep routes, crossing routes and running between the tackles.

They are leaving both flats completely open. Challenging the RBs and TEs to win with the swings, screens and sweeps. Hubbard and Sanders can't get it up field by beating 1 defender.

That has to be won to break the Washington D

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

That’s different.  You asked why people want Canales to run the freaking ball and not go to the pass so early. 

Hubbard is our best player. Leaning on him prevents the opposing from getting on the field and scoring points.  Canales doesn’t do this.  He should. 

They are sitting on Hubbard.  They are on him as soon as he gets the ball.  We aren't going to be able to run the ball.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Davidson Deac II said:

They are sitting on the run, doubling Johnson, and with Thielen out, we have no one else who is a threat.  

Overall it’s been Canales that has stopped Hubbard more than opposing defenses.   AT isn’t much of a threat.  If an offensive coach can’t scheme up XL, Coker and Mingo to replace AT WITH a vet QB…..that’s probably on the coach 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

That’s different.  You asked why people want Canales to run the freaking ball and not go to the pass so early. 

Hubbard is our best player. Leaning on him prevents the opposing from getting on the field and scoring points.  Canales doesn’t do this.  He should. 

You realize the offense still gets 8 to 10 drives a game, right? You see that the running game can't consistently win?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the last time I watched the Pro Bowl was that year Sean Taylor blew up that poor punter. LOL
    • I don’t go back and look at the espn but there live it definitely said 1 shot 1 goal when it happened. I guess they had not added them yet. Still allowing goals that early is rough. Blue line is a total disaster still. Even with Slavin back. Miller and Nikishin keep making mistakes after mistakes. 
    • I generally disagree with the concept of picking a position because of value early in the draft. For instance, if there's a really good safety, RB or ILB at pick 10, I'm choosing him over a project WR or DE. Better players make the team better. A bunch of ok players will give you an ok team. The number 1 goal of the draft should be to improve the overall talent on the team. Not to fill positions of need.  Deciding beforehand that you're picking a LT in the first or second round because Ickey went down is not the way to improve the team. Now if Dan has similar grades on 2 or 3 players and one happens to be a LT, then yeah go for it. But don't pass on your guy at ILB because you have a gap at LT or need to improve the pass rush with a DE. When those guys don't pan out then you haven't improved your team. But that LB could have been a franchise cornerstone for years to come. See Luke Kuechly and Christian McCaffrey. 
×
×
  • Create New...