Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Graziano: Panthers will trade Diontae Johnson


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

I absolutely agree with the last sentence of your post. I disagree (just a little) with sentence 2.

I'd hate to lose AT and DJ in the middle of the season. These guys are established VETS who understand coverages and know how to get open. If we lose both of them before the deadline we would have no veteran presence to help the QBs during the game or help the younger guys develop their games. If AT and DJ are both traded we would probably have the youngest receiving core in the NFL...paired with the worst QB play if somehow Young ends up getting most of the snaps going forward.

Unless David Moore becomes a starter, 3 of our starters (Coker, Mingo, and Legette) would have less than 2 years of experience. The Panthers TE corps is among the worst in the league. Scoring points would become harder which is the last thing the team can afford with a defense as poor as ours. If Dalton returns soon I'd like to give him at least one VET to depend on for the next 11 games.

but if Andy Dalton is your QB.....what do you want the vets helping him do? I don't want us to win a random game at this point.  I just want offensive volume in losing efforts. 

I do get having AT maybe to just lead a young WR room of how to go about business.  But Dionate Johnson is here because of how he has acted.....so, I see no real reason to keep him (and make it 2).  

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, HardcoreHokie said:

Grew up in Frederick, MD.  Lived in Charlotte most of my life.

Currently working in Frederick MD.

Frederick suuuuuuuuucks.

Charlotte times 100,000 - not comparable.

Maryland sucks as a whole compared to VA and NC and even SC.

Annapolis is the only city I like in MD.

But it’s far better than WV and PA.

NC for the win.

I think Frederick itself isn't great, but it's a good location to access everything else. An hour from Harper's Ferry, the Shenandoah, Baltimore, Towson, Tyson's Corner, DC. And you can always drive 20-30 minutes to Rockville or Bethesda. Of course I'm partial to Annapolis too, but that's a bit of a hike from Frederick. The biggest gut punch is traffic. 66 is better after the COVID construction, but 495 and 270 are still hell on earth.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, CRA said:

but if Andy Dalton is your QB.....what do you want the vets helping him do? I don't want us to win a random game at this point.  I just want offensive volume in losing efforts. 

I do get having AT maybe to just lead a young WR room of how to go about business.  But Dionate Johnson is here because of how he has acted.....so, I see no real reason to keep him (and make it 2).  

I have no problem with moving Johnson. He doesn't want to be here going forward so I'm cool with trading him. I wouldn't want  to trade AT if a deal is brokered for Johnson by the deadline for the reason I cited earlier.  I hope that clarified my view.

Edited by SCO96
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, WhoKnows said:

Umm, did you see his interview after the 40-7 loss where he said he can’t play every position? I am not going to call that cancerous because he’s correct, but he’s not resigning with us. That’s clear.

[Deploying the Galactic Universal translator]

”Hey, Dan, I’m done with this poo.  No way I’m re-signing here.  Eat dirt.”

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, bythenbrs said:

[Deploying the Galactic Universal translator]

”Hey, Dan, I’m done with this poo.  No way I’m re-signing here.  Eat dirt.”

After not having a losing season to 1-6 and a team so far from competing, it’s extremely obvious that he’s gone. That’s why you see if you can get good value now.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

After not having a losing season to 1-6 and a team so far from competing, it’s extremely obvious that he’s gone. That’s why you see if you can get good value now.

Any value. Saves us money. Saves us a bad example probably for anyone still giving a poo. And what do you get if the trade deadline passes and he is playing out the string? 

I mean, that type of stuff carried on to the field (I believe that line is now crossed), will cost him money but he may not be able to restrain himself. Even if he realizes he is hurting himself.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt Miller brought up an interesting scenario for the “who the heck wants to trade up with this class?” Crowd, with Daboll being given the blessing that he will be here next year.

Looks like the Giants will have a chance to draft their own QB and if the panthers are 1 or 2, I could see the giants trading up to secure either Sanders or Ward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imo, what we need is large numbers of picks.  The reality is that with virtually any NFL team, there are going to be picks that fail.  The more picks you have, the greater the odds that you will get legitimate players.  Which is why I get annoyed when we trade two picks (or in some cases more) to move up a few spots to get one player.  

So if trading a guy (Johnson) who will not be here next year anyway nets us a third or even a second, great.  But just pick the best guy available at that slot, and don't try to move up to get your guy.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Imo, what we need is large numbers of picks.  The reality is that with virtually any NFL team, there are going to be picks that fail.  The more picks you have, the greater the odds that you will get legitimate players.  Which is why I get annoyed when we trade two picks (or in some cases more) to move up a few spots to get one player.  

So if trading a guy (Johnson) who will not be here next year anyway nets us a third or even a second, great.  But just pick the best guy available at that slot, and don't try to move up to get your guy.  

DeAndre Hopkins is 100 times the player that Johnson is, even at his age and he was had for a 5th.  We'll be lucky to get a 6th for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BrianS said:

DeAndre Hopkins is 100 times the player that Johnson is, even at his age and he was had for a 5th.  We'll be lucky to get a 6th for him.

No he's not. You still living in the past. Hopkins has been injury prone over the last few years and he's no longer a deep threat WR.

 

Johnson at this point is a better WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we can trade Johnson and we are going to have to tag him unless he's a complete locker room mess.  I doubt he's going to be a locker room problem because he knows he can't get paid with this rep that he already has.  Without Johnson, we literally have no receiving threats and how are we going to develop any QB without receivers.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...